post-nuke vs php-nuke for content management system ?

[jimmyhaha]

I heard that post-nuke is more secure than php-nuke

but php-nuke seems to have more support and is more popular than post-nuke

btw, what about phpwebsite ?

any advice ?

thanks

 

[jonmullen]

I like post-nuke

 

[BeauJangles]

postnuke is written by guys who were fed up with phpnuke's bugs and the slow release of new versions.

 

[jimmyhaha]

up

 

[eliteorange]

i like the great integration phpnuke has, but i hate the graphical layout... and none of the theme really look all that different.

i use mambo open source but the compoent integration is very bad... (i.e. phpbb)

is there a CMS that looks good and has great compoent integratation?

 

[Crackabot]

If you don't think that $65 is too much Deluxe Portal is fantastic

My brother uses something called E107 and he likes better than both phpnuke and postnuke.

 

[manko]

I chose Post-Nuke and wasn't disappointed.

 

[TSDible]

I'm using PHPWebsite right now. I like the layout of the admin area, but I think the support and updates are a bit slow.

I'm looking for a new CMS myself, and I'm not sure which one to go with for a small personal site. Plus, I'm an amature, so it needs to be easy to set up.

I tried php-nuke a while back when I decided to go with PHPWebsite. I kept getting lost in the admin menus, and couldn't make it act exactly like I wanted it to.

I'm interested to hear any other experiences from post-nuke vs. whatever CMS

 

[joinT]

I found an EXTREMELY complex - but EXTREMELY nice & powerful CMS type site.

http://typo3.org/