Possibly the most important science breakthrough happened today (not really)

Page 19 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Toggle sidebar Toggle sidebar
SKORPI0

SKORPI0

Lifer
Jan 18, 2000
18,485
2,419
136
http://ecat.org/

Rossi also reported that the industrial 1 megawatt eCat acquired by an unidentified military customer has been available for 90% of the time, or about 8000 hours, with a COP of 6. Rossi reports the home eCat is “years away,” supposedly due to consumer testing and certification requirements.
Click to expand...
:whiste:
 
W

wirednuts

Diamond Member
Jan 26, 2007
7,121
4
0
we haven't had any proven breakthroughs in over a year... but we haven't had any proven failures either. im starting to believe this might be real!



:sneaky:
 
adlep

adlep

Diamond Member
Mar 25, 2001
5,287
6
81
Brainonska511 said:
I think the foil is cutting off the circulation to your brain. Consider loosening your hat...
Click to expand...

So it is my fault?

Don't kill the messenger, read the report.

Edit: I'd actually go out there and buy a bottle of champagne
20 pages and not a single message of support...:(

From the report:

The scope of the present work is to make an independent test of the E-Cat HT reactor under controlled conditions and with high precision instrumentation. It should be emphasized that the measurement must be performed with high accuracy and reliability, so that any possible excess heat production can be established beyond any doubt, as no known processes exist which can explain any abundant heat production in the E-Cat reactor.
Click to expand...

So there, rather than being mad at me, short your oil stock tomorrow :p It is indeed a breakthrough in science.
 
Last edited:
irishScott

irishScott

Lifer
Oct 10, 2006
21,562
3
0
You kind of lose validity by keeping up with this thread. It's pretty clear you're so invested at this point an e-cat could blow up right under your balls and you'd still cheer it as a breakthrough.

Look at it this way, when it starts powering something not used by scientists on a daily basis, then you can come back here and laugh all you like. Until then, your rabid defense of Rossi has longed ceased to serve a purpose beyond entertainment at your own expense.
 
adlep

adlep

Diamond Member
Mar 25, 2001
5,287
6
81
irishScott said:
You kind of lose validity by keeping up with this thread. It's pretty clear you're so invested at this point an e-cat could blow up right under your balls and you'd still cheer it as a breakthrough.

Look at it this way, when it starts powering something not used by scientists on a daily basis, then you can come back here and laugh all you like. Until then, your rabid defense of Rossi has longed ceased to serve a purpose beyond entertainment at your own expense.
Click to expand...

Thanks for your insight. I appreciate it. Read the last pdf.
 
M

Mr. Pedantic

Diamond Member
Feb 14, 2010
5,027
0
76
adlep said:
So it is my fault?

Don't kill the messenger, read the report.

Edit: I'd actually go out there and buy a bottle of champagne
20 pages and not a single message of support...:(

From the report:



So there, rather than being mad at me, short your oil stock tomorrow :p It is indeed a breakthrough in science.
Click to expand...

At this point, criticism is the most constructive form of support we can give. Same with any other unvalidated scientific hypothesis. Even one that would threaten to overturn large swathes of established physics theory. Especially one that would threaten to overturn large swathes of established physics theory.
 
adlep

adlep

Diamond Member
Mar 25, 2001
5,287
6
81
DrPizza said:
Thread title was corrected because false thread titles are not allowed. -DrPizza
Click to expand...

OK,
I will step away from this thread again for a while. Lets revisit in few months and update the developments.
XO
 
DrPizza

DrPizza

Administrator Elite Member Goat Whisperer
Mar 5, 2001
49,601
167
111
www.slatebrookfarm.com
Instead, why don't you go through this thread and answer why every single thing failed to come true. 18 months ago, there was a company (rumors google - lol) who was testing this out. What ever became of that? Oh, I know... nothing, because there was no test because this is a fraud.
 
adlep

adlep

Diamond Member
Mar 25, 2001
5,287
6
81
DrPizza said:
Instead, why don't you go through this thread and answer why every single thing failed to come true. 18 months ago, there was a company (rumors google - lol) who was testing this out. What ever became of that? Oh, I know... nothing, because there was no test because this is a fraud.
Click to expand...

OK!
 
PowerEngineer

PowerEngineer

Diamond Member
Oct 22, 2001
3,606
786
136
adlep said:
Dr Pizza can stick it:

Update 5/19/2013,

Rossi's reactor has been verified by a 3rd party test:

http://ecat.com/files/Indication-of-anomalous-heat-energy-production-in-a-reactor-device.pdf

It seems like a dawn of a new era, enjoy folks
Click to expand...

OH NOOOOOO! How could you?

computer-facepalm.gif


You can't seriously suggest that Levi is a "3rd party"!

Oh, look here:

http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/LeviGreportonhe.pdf

He proved it once before in 2010!

Here's another more likely explanation of the phenomenon:

http://newenergytimes.com/v2/sr/RossiECat/Andrea-Rossi-Energy-Catalyzer-Investigation-Index.shtml

The mods should lock this thread for your own good!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

COMPANY
RESOURCES
FOLLOW
Top Bottom