Originally posted by: Shalmanese
AFAIK, inductive chargers still suffer from the good ole inverse square law which has been what made wireless power so impractical. Move something twice as far away and you get 1/4th the efficiency.
The reason why inductive chargers work so well is because there is only a few mm gap between the charger and the target and because the target is so large relative to the charger. something like a mouse and a keyboard might work but something like a laptop in a house would definately not work via inductive charging. but seeing as wired mouse are perfectly adequate right now, I dont see much point in having an inductively charged on, perhaps a mousemat charger might catch on though.
That's incorrect. The company which is developing the charging pads are targeting them towards cellphones, PDAs, and yes, LAPTOP computers. Full-fledged ones.
Understand this isn't a "few mm" gap - The electrodes on the notebook would be flush with the bottom surface, and would be a few hundred atoms away from the pad when resting on top.
Personally, I see no reason why this can't be expanded to other devices in the next few years. How big do you think a stereo reciever will be in 2008? By that time, I see stereos existing on a single chip or three, with the majority of area being consumed by the PCB to feed the inputs and outputs. How much power would a stereo the size of a paper ream consume?
As for devices that will always be higher consumption, such as monitors and TVs - There's always the ability to put multiple leads instead of one set. The entire bottom can be decked out with them.
To write this technology off without seriously considering the exponential increase in the complexity of technology is, as previously stated, shortsighted.