Possible Nuclear Attack on Saturday

[Saint Nick]

i don't think anyone will attack anyone for fear that they will get the living crap beat out of them.

 

[jpeyton]

Originally posted by: dwell

Originally posted by: jpeyton
Last time I checked, their goals were "to rid the holy land of infidels", "to stop the support of corrupt rulers", and "to stop the stealing of our wealth". Those were Zawahri's words, approximately. I would interpret that to mean the following...remove our soldiers and bases from Middle East countries, and stop supporting/toppling regimes in that region as we please.

That's just the start. At the core radical Islam has three choices for non-Muslims:

1) Submit and convert to Islam.
2) Live under Islamic law as a second class citizen and pay a tax called "jizya."
3) Death.

Seriously, that's the agenda.

The keywords being "radical Islam" and not simply "Islam".

Just like radical Christianity supports bombing abortion clinics, while Christianity does not. Neither support abortion as God's will, but one interprets that to an extreme, just like radical Islamists.

For al-Qaeda, that's not "just the start", that's the whole shebang. Their goals have remained quite steady for quite some time.

 

Originally posted by: jpeyton
For al-Qaeda, that's not "just the start", that's the whole shebang. Their goals have remained quite steady for quite some time.

You trust al-Qaeda's word on it? Hahaha. Stay the hell away from me when the sh*t hits the fan.

 

[jpeyton]

Originally posted by: dwell

Originally posted by: jpeyton
For al-Qaeda, that's not "just the start", that's the whole shebang. Their goals have remained quite steady for quite some time.

You trust al-Qaeda's word on it? Hahaha. Stay the hell away from me when the sh*t hits the fan.

Keep underestimating their intelligence. They have an agenda, but they are not bent on world domination. If they wanted to dominate the world, I'm sure they could bomb some targets in Argentina and Norway, but instead they focus on countries that will further their agenda.

Like bombing Spain which led to their pullout from Iraq. Or bombing the UK, who still has a presence there.

 

[Fox5]

I don't think Al Qaeda could have true nuclear weapons in America. Dirty bombs are a possibility, but dirty bombs would kill hundreds or thousands and not millions, plus leave a rather small area as a "no man's land" for hundreds of years. Of course, the health effects would probably be devasting in a much larger area, but I'd say dirty bombs are more on the level of chemical and biological weapons than nuclear bombs.

 

[botd4u]

If U.S. does get attacked by nuclear bombs by middle easterners. There are two possibility that might happen.

1: US launches butt loads of nukes back at middle east's countries where terrorist populates and f*ck them all. And kill all the middle easterners that are living in U.S. or exile them to another country.

2: US stays cool and don't launch any nukes but sends more soldiers and tanks or what ever to Clean up Middle east, the whole country total war, and kill or exiles all the middle easterners to another country.

3: US decides to attack first with nuclear bombs, This I can agree on cause I don't like any of the middle east people they do nothing but cause trouble in the U.S. and to the rest of this world. They're nothing but a bunch of worthless trouble makers, why even allow them to immigrate to our country, their religion is some how misleading them into great destruction. We should've filtered them out of our country after 9/11. Either kill or kick them back to Middle east with 747s.

If you don't like what I just said. Too bad.

 

[jpeyton]

Originally posted by: botd4u
If U.S. does get attacked by nuclear bombs by middle easterners. There are two possibility that might happen.

1: US launches butt loads of nukes back at middle east's countries where terrorist populates and f*ck them all. And kill all the middle easterners that are living in U.S. or exile them to another country.

2: US stays cool and don't launch any nukes but sends more soldiers and tanks or what ever to Clean up Middle east, the whole country total war, and kill or exiles all the middle easterners to another country.

3: US decides to attack first with nuclear bombs, This I can agree on cause I don't like any of the middle east people they do nothing but cause trouble in the U.S. and to the rest of this world. They're nothing but a bunch of worthless trouble makers, why even allow them to immigrate to our country, their religion is some how misleading them into great destruction. We should've filtered them out of our country after 9/11. Either kill or kick them back to Middle east with 747s.

If you don't like what I just said. Too bad.

Rrrrrright. :roll: Again, LOGICAL explanations have been posted several times (just a few posts before yours).

Attacking Iran is a definite maybe. Other countries, not so likely.

Kthxbye!

PS, keep in touch and let us know how middle school treats you.

 

[dabuddha]

Originally posted by: jpeyton

Originally posted by: botd4u
If U.S. does get attacked by nuclear bombs by middle easterners. There are two possibility that might happen.

1: US launches butt loads of nukes back at middle east's countries where terrorist populates and f*ck them all. And kill all the middle easterners that are living in U.S. or exile them to another country.

2: US stays cool and don't launch any nukes but sends more soldiers and tanks or what ever to Clean up Middle east, the whole country total war, and kill or exiles all the middle easterners to another country.

3: US decides to attack first with nuclear bombs, This I can agree on cause I don't like any of the middle east people they do nothing but cause trouble in the U.S. and to the rest of this world. They're nothing but a bunch of worthless trouble makers, why even allow them to immigrate to our country, their religion is some how misleading them into great destruction. We should've filtered them out of our country after 9/11. Either kill or kick them back to Middle east with 747s.

If you don't like what I just said. Too bad.

Rrrrrright. :roll: Again, LOGICAL explanations have been posted several times (just a few posts before yours).

Attacking Iran is a definite maybe. Other countries, not so likely.

Kthxbye!

PS, keep in touch and let us know how middle school treats you.

Thankfully ignorant people like botd4u don't represent most Americans

 

Originally posted by: jpeyton
Like bombing Spain which led to their pullout from Iraq. Or bombing the UK, who still has a presence there.

So let's submit to their whim and pull out of the Middle East like Spain! Dude, your a freaking al-Qaeda sympathizer. Plain and simple. That's just wrong.

 

[jpeyton]

Originally posted by: dwell

Originally posted by: jpeyton
Like bombing Spain which led to their pullout from Iraq. Or bombing the UK, who still has a presence there.

So let's submit to their whim and pull out of the Middle East like Spain! Dude, your a freaking al-Qaeda sympathizer. Plain and simple. That's just wrong.

Like, dude, you have a reading and comprehension problem.

I stated what their tactics and goals are. I didn't say we should pull out. Forgive me for trying to understand our enemies, instead of being part of the chorus of ignoramuses yelling "OMG lets bombXored the middle east!!#%BBQ".

Submitting to fearmongering might be fun for some of you guys, though.

 

[Aquila76]

Originally posted by: botd4u
If U.S. does get attacked by nuclear bombs by middle easterners. There are two possibility that might happen.

1: US launches butt loads of nukes back at middle east's countries where terrorist populates and f*ck them all. And kill all the middle easterners that are living in U.S. or exile them to another country.

2: US stays cool and don't launch any nukes but sends more soldiers and tanks or what ever to Clean up Middle east, the whole country total war, and kill or exiles all the middle easterners to another country.

3: US decides to attack first with nuclear bombs, This I can agree on cause I don't like any of the middle east people they do nothing but cause trouble in the U.S. and to the rest of this world. They're nothing but a bunch of worthless trouble makers, why even allow them to immigrate to our country, their religion is some how misleading them into great destruction. We should've filtered them out of our country after 9/11. Either kill or kick them back to Middle east with 747s.

If you don't like what I just said. Too bad.

Wow. Self pwned w/inability to keep track of number of own illogical ramblings.

 

[botd4u]

Any country in middle east that populate terrorist will die when the first nuke hits US soil

 

[botd4u]

haha

 

[botd4u]

I guess people on the internet aren't allowed to express their opionions anymore because a bunch of geeks and nerds that has to see life super logically loL. If we did why did 9/11 happened? And why did US started war with IRAQ? Why do so much Terrorist or what ever sh*t from Middle east hates us so much and want to put us in the under a f*cking nuclear bomb?

 

[botd4u]

Originally posted by: Aquila76

Originally posted by: botd4u
If U.S. does get attacked by nuclear bombs by middle easterners. There are two possibility that might happen.

1: US launches butt loads of nukes back at middle east's countries where terrorist populates and f*ck them all. And kill all the middle easterners that are living in U.S. or exile them to another country.

2: US stays cool and don't launch any nukes but sends more soldiers and tanks or what ever to Clean up Middle east, the whole country total war, and kill or exiles all the middle easterners to another country.

3: US decides to attack first with nuclear bombs, This I can agree on cause I don't like any of the middle east people they do nothing but cause trouble in the U.S. and to the rest of this world. They're nothing but a bunch of worthless trouble makers, why even allow them to immigrate to our country, their religion is some how misleading them into great destruction. We should've filtered them out of our country after 9/11. Either kill or kick them back to Middle east with 747s.

If you don't like what I just said. Too bad.

Wow. Self pwned w/inability to keep track of number of own illogical ramblings.

Ur so full of BS with ur american politics u know that? That's why you can't even prevent 9/11 mr. white eagle

 

[botd4u]

Originally posted by: jpeyton

Originally posted by: dwell

Originally posted by: jpeyton
Like bombing Spain which led to their pullout from Iraq. Or bombing the UK, who still has a presence there.

So let's submit to their whim and pull out of the Middle East like Spain! Dude, your a freaking al-Qaeda sympathizer. Plain and simple. That's just wrong.

Like, dude, you have a reading and comprehension problem.

I stated what their tactics and goals are. I didn't say we should pull out. Forgive me for trying to understand our enemies, instead of being part of the chorus of ignoramuses yelling "OMG lets bombXored the middle east!!#%BBQ".

Submitting to fearmongering might be fun for some of you guys, though.

If U.S. does get attacked by nukes, I'm pretty sure we'll nuke them back.

 

[EyeMWing]

God damn I hope the terrorists nuke this thread. They'd be doing the world a service.

 

[Conky]

Originally posted by: jpeyton

Originally posted by: dwell

Originally posted by: jpeyton
For al-Qaeda, that's not "just the start", that's the whole shebang. Their goals have remained quite steady for quite some time.

You trust al-Qaeda's word on it? Hahaha. Stay the hell away from me when the sh*t hits the fan.

Keep underestimating their intelligence. They have an agenda, but they are not bent on world domination. If they wanted to dominate the world, I'm sure they could bomb some targets in Argentina and Norway, but instead they focus on countries that will further their agenda.

Like bombing Spain which led to their pullout from Iraq. Or bombing the UK, who still has a presence there.

Did Bin Laden die and make you Al Queda's official spokesman? :roll:

The terrorists don't get to have their own country. They can intimidate Spain but the USA and British are not going to be intimidated by cowards hiding in caves.

P.S. Kerry lost

 

[MrDingleDangle]

so what country funded this nuke attack? I mean which countries leaders decided, oh i think its about time I want to die and destroy my whole country while i go, ill make some nukes for Bin Laden

and dont tell me Bin Laden made some nukes in an underground bunker out of dirt and wood.

 

[jpeyton]

Originally posted by: Crazyfool

Originally posted by: jpeyton

Originally posted by: dwell

Originally posted by: jpeyton
For al-Qaeda, that's not "just the start", that's the whole shebang. Their goals have remained quite steady for quite some time.

You trust al-Qaeda's word on it? Hahaha. Stay the hell away from me when the sh*t hits the fan.

Keep underestimating their intelligence. They have an agenda, but they are not bent on world domination. If they wanted to dominate the world, I'm sure they could bomb some targets in Argentina and Norway, but instead they focus on countries that will further their agenda.

Like bombing Spain which led to their pullout from Iraq. Or bombing the UK, who still has a presence there.

Did Bin Laden die and make you Al Queda's official spokesman? :roll:

The terrorists don't get to have their own country. They can intimidate Spain but the USA and British are not going to be intimidated by cowards hiding in caves.

P.S. Kerry lost

Nope, not a spokesperson, just trying to see what their motives are.

Never said the terrorists get to have their own country.

Never said the US or Britain are going to be intimidated.

You and dwell should be buddies.

so what country funded this nuke attack? I mean which countries leaders decided, oh i think its about time I want to die and destroy my whole country while i go, ill make some nukes for Bin Laden

and dont tell me Bin Laden made some nukes in an underground bunker out of dirt and wood.

Most likely a pissed off Russian. So I guess we're going to nuke Russia when al-Qaeda hits and end the world in a lovely nuclear winter.

 

[Conky]

Originally posted by: jpeyton


Nope, not a spokesperson, just trying to see what their motives are.

Never said the terrorists get to have their own country.

Never said the US or Britain are going to be intimidated.

You and dwell should be buddies.

Actually, me and dwell are buddies. :beer:

 

Originally posted by: Crazyfool
Actually, me and dwell are buddies. :beer:

Hey yeah! :beer: TTT when the sh*t hits the fan, I'd rather have Crazyfool on my side with his arsenal than jpeyton who'd be getting fit for a burka


:beer::beer::beer:

 

[jpeyton]

Originally posted by: dwell

Originally posted by: Crazyfool
Actually, me and dwell are buddies. :beer:

Hey yeah! :beer: TTT when the sh*t hits the fan, I'd rather have Crazyfool on my side with his arsenal than jpeyton who'd be getting fit for a burka


:beer::beer::beer:

I'd rather have intelligence and logic by my side, thanks.

 

[alkemyst]

Originally posted by: jpeyton

Originally posted by: dwell

Originally posted by: Crazyfool
Actually, me and dwell are buddies. :beer:

Hey yeah! :beer: TTT when the sh*t hits the fan, I'd rather have Crazyfool on my side with his arsenal than jpeyton who'd be getting fit for a burka


:beer::beer::beer:

I'd rather have intelligence and logic by my side, thanks.

let us know when you find it.

 

[jpeyton]

Originally posted by: alkemyst

Originally posted by: jpeyton

Originally posted by: dwell

Originally posted by: Crazyfool
Actually, me and dwell are buddies. :beer:

Hey yeah! :beer: TTT when the sh*t hits the fan, I'd rather have Crazyfool on my side with his arsenal than jpeyton who'd be getting fit for a burka


:beer::beer::beer:

I'd rather have intelligence and logic by my side, thanks.

let us know when you find it.

Won't find it in this thread, that's for sure.