• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Porsche 911 Turbo tops 0-62-0 competition

Originally posted by: Syringer
Originally posted by: ultimatebob
Wow, I'm amazed that there are SUV's out there that can do the 0-62-0 test in under 8 seconds.

Ever seen a BMW X5 4.8, Cayenne Turbo, or ML55 AMG?

i doubt any of those could do sub 8s besides the cayenne turbo s
 
Originally posted by: mariok2006
Originally posted by: ElFenix
0-100-0 isn't as good when it's in kilometers

😕

0 to 100 to 0 is a classic sports car test. if done in miles per hour, it can really separate out the men from the boys. but when done in kilometers per hour, it only gets up to 62 miles per hour, which even staid family sedans can reach in well under 7 seconds these days.
 
Originally posted by: ElFenix
Originally posted by: mariok2006
Originally posted by: ElFenix
0-100-0 isn't as good when it's in kilometers

😕

0 to 100 to 0 is a classic sports car test. if done in miles per hour, it can really separate out the men from the boys. but when done in kilometers per hour, it only gets up to 62 miles per hour, which even staid family sedans can reach in under 7 seconds these days.

Uh, no they can't. Even the M5, the only "family sedan" included in that test, couldn't get 'er done in less than 7 seconds.
 
Originally posted by: Nebor
Originally posted by: ElFenix
Originally posted by: mariok2006
Originally posted by: ElFenix
0-100-0 isn't as good when it's in kilometers

😕

0 to 100 to 0 is a classic sports car test. if done in miles per hour, it can really separate out the men from the boys. but when done in kilometers per hour, it only gets up to 62 miles per hour, which even staid family sedans can reach in under 7 seconds these days.

Uh, no they can't. Even the M5, the only "family sedan" included in that test, couldn't get 'er done in less than 7 seconds.

im pretty sure he meant just 0-62
 
Originally posted by: mariok2006
Originally posted by: Nebor
Originally posted by: ElFenix
Originally posted by: mariok2006
Originally posted by: ElFenix
0-100-0 isn't as good when it's in kilometers

😕

0 to 100 to 0 is a classic sports car test. if done in miles per hour, it can really separate out the men from the boys. but when done in kilometers per hour, it only gets up to 62 miles per hour, which even staid family sedans can reach in under 7 seconds these days.

Uh, no they can't. Even the M5, the only "family sedan" included in that test, couldn't get 'er done in less than 7 seconds.

im pretty sure he meant just 0-62

yup. the M5 can certainly accomplish that is under 7 seconds.
 
Originally posted by: ElFenix
Originally posted by: mariok2006
Originally posted by: Nebor
Originally posted by: ElFenix
Originally posted by: mariok2006
Originally posted by: ElFenix
0-100-0 isn't as good when it's in kilometers

😕

0 to 100 to 0 is a classic sports car test. if done in miles per hour, it can really separate out the men from the boys. but when done in kilometers per hour, it only gets up to 62 miles per hour, which even staid family sedans can reach in under 7 seconds these days.

Uh, no they can't. Even the M5, the only "family sedan" included in that test, couldn't get 'er done in less than 7 seconds.

im pretty sure he meant just 0-62

yup. the M5 can certainly accomplish that is under 7 seconds.

With about 2.5 seconds to spare. 😀
 
Back
Top