Porsche 911 Turbo S: 0-60 in 2.7, 1/4 mile in 10.8 @ 129 mph

Discussion in 'The Garage' started by 996GT2, Oct 16, 2010.

  1. 996GT2

    996GT2 Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2005
    Messages:
    5,192
    Likes Received:
    0
    [​IMG]

    ONE second to hit 30, and 2.7 to 60. 10.8 quarter mile is within hitting range of the Veyron (which usually does mid 10s). Those acceleration figures are ridiculous for a production car. The AWD and PDK must work really well together.

    17/25 MPG isn't all that bad either considering the performance
     
    #1 996GT2, Oct 16, 2010
    Last edited: Oct 16, 2010
  2. Imported

    Imported Lifer

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2000
    Messages:
    14,588
    Likes Received:
    9
    I want the 458.. its the loudest. :D
     
  3. OS

    OS Lifer

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 1999
    Messages:
    15,581
    Likes Received:
    0
    that is stupid fast..after all the GTR/911 turbo comparisons porsche probably sat up and did something about it
     
  4. exdeath

    exdeath Lifer

    Joined:
    Jan 29, 2004
    Messages:
    13,678
    Likes Received:
    4
    I like how it's the fastest car there, and also the cheapest.
     
  5. RavenSEAL

    RavenSEAL Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Jan 4, 2010
    Messages:
    8,671
    Likes Received:
    1
    Nasty stuff.
     
  6. Mutilator

    Mutilator Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2000
    Messages:
    3,498
    Likes Received:
    4
    There are reasons why a 911 Turbo will probably ALWAYS be at the top of my list for daily driver dream cars and performance is one of them. I will have one before I die.
     
  7. skyking

    skyking Lifer

    Joined:
    Nov 21, 2001
    Messages:
    17,884
    Likes Received:
    126
    Very nice feature.
     
  8. Kirby

    Kirby Lifer

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2006
    Messages:
    12,040
    Likes Received:
    1
    pure sex
     
  9. brainhulk

    brainhulk Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2007
    Messages:
    8,376
    Likes Received:
    37
    I still like a 911 GT3 RS moar, but that is crazy fast
     
  10. punjabiplaya

    punjabiplaya Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2006
    Messages:
    3,495
    Likes Received:
    0
    Well, do to emissions horse crap, Ferrari is soon going to be introducing turbo engines. Let the boost wars begin (well, resume actually).
     
  11. Arkaign

    Arkaign Lifer

    Joined:
    Oct 27, 2006
    Messages:
    19,305
    Likes Received:
    1
    Holy lord.

    Ferrari : F458 Italia, stunningly beautiful and a ridiculously good all around performer, all for a lot less than a Lexus LF-A. Sounds spectacular as well.

    Lambo : New car focusing on super lightweight design, looks intense, performance rumored to be GODLY compared to current Lambos.

    Porsche : New 911 Turbo S : Just makes all of the other Porsches look weak. Even the Carrera GT that recently retailed for $500k+ has nothing on this performance. 2.7 seconds to 60?

    Is it just me or have the exotics / premier sports cars just gone bananas in the past 12 months or so. For a long time it seemed like ~3.6-4.0 second 0-60 was top-tier acceleration, along with high 11s/low 12s 1/4 times. Suddenly there's been a quantum shift forward.

    Oh, and lol at R8. The upgraded 5.2L variant suffers pure annihilation at the hands of Porsche.

    Is this payback to the world for every car mag singing songs about R8 and GT-R?
     
  12. JulesMaximus

    JulesMaximus No Lifer

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2003
    Messages:
    72,516
    Likes Received:
    194
    I really don't get the magazine benchmarks or magazine benchmark racing for that matter. A Yamaha R1 will do the 1/4 mile in around 10 seconds flat at over 140mph...but I've never ridden one. Might as well quote nurburgring lap times for all that's worth.
     
  13. punjabiplaya

    punjabiplaya Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2006
    Messages:
    3,495
    Likes Received:
    0
    pissing contest
     
  14. zerocool84

    zerocool84 Lifer

    Joined:
    Nov 11, 2004
    Messages:
    34,759
    Likes Received:
    75
    Bike, car, bike, car, bike, car, bike, car.
     
  15. Gigantopithecus

    Gigantopithecus Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Dec 14, 2004
    Messages:
    7,665
    Likes Received:
    0
    [​IMG]

    My father purchased this 'used' (500 miles) from a player on the AZ Diamondbacks a few years ago. Its speed is frightening until you get acquainted with it. As fast as it is, its agility impresses me even more. It is a dream to drive. He's indicated that the S model is his retirement prize - we'll see if mom permits that!
     
  16. GTaudiophile

    GTaudiophile Lifer

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2000
    Messages:
    29,768
    Likes Received:
    0
    If I had the money to do that kind of shopping...and just speaking in terms of personal desirability...I would consider them in this order:

    Aston Martin V12 Vantage: Ultimate in understated luxury and power. I could easily see it as an everyday driver.

    Ferrari 458: Ultimate track car but don't think I could ever use one as a daily driver. Might as well wait for the "Scuderia" version, honed for track days. People who drive these things downtown are just posers.

    Porsche 911 Turbo S: Best combination of the above: track car, race car, and everyday driver.

    MB SLS AMG: Probably fun to have as a collector's car but otherwise I find it to be pretty "meh." Actually, just give me a BMW Z8 instead. At least James Bond drove one of those.

    Audi R8: I prefer the GT version but wish they offered that with the lighter V8. For some reason I just don't think the R8 belongs with this group of cars. Give me a 2008/2009 S8 instead.
     
  17. Don Vito Corleone

    Joined:
    Feb 10, 2000
    Messages:
    29,999
    Likes Received:
    33
    Jeebus - off the top of my head I can't think of any car sold in the US, other than the Veyron, that is that quick. No road-legal Ferrari or Lambo has ever rivaled that 0-60 time, and the new MP4-12C is a hair slower as well. The 911 is also obviously much more reliable than those cars, and can actually be used every day. Amazing. I think I'd probably still rather have a Singer 911, though . . .
     
    #17 Don Vito Corleone, Oct 16, 2010
    Last edited: Oct 17, 2010
  18. ponyo

    ponyo Lifer

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2002
    Messages:
    13,751
    Likes Received:
    126
    Those are sick numbers if true. I just love turbo cars. Nothing like hearing and feeling the turbos kick in.
     
  19. LTC8K6

    LTC8K6 Lifer

    Joined:
    Mar 10, 2004
    Messages:
    24,532
    Likes Received:
    139
    How about a curve?
     
  20. RichUK

    RichUK Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2005
    Messages:
    9,802
    Likes Received:
    337
    Damn, that is quick!

    GT3 RS for me, though.
     
  21. RichUK

    RichUK Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2005
    Messages:
    9,802
    Likes Received:
    337
  22. yhelothar

    yhelothar Lifer

    Joined:
    Dec 11, 2002
    Messages:
    18,304
    Likes Received:
    11
    WOW how does it do it with that kind of power to weight? I mean if it's AWD, that should only help to 0-60 about, and the much more powerful RWD cars should whip it to the quarter mile.
     
  23. chin311

    chin311 Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Feb 27, 2003
    Messages:
    4,295
    Likes Received:
    2
  24. darkswordsman17

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2004
    Messages:
    15,663
    Likes Received:
    35
    I don't get what you're not getting? Do you want them to just tell you how fast stuff is by the seat of the pants? Its just another metric by which to compare vehicles. Hell, I doubt most people would be able to tell the difference between a 10 second quarter mile and a 12 second one, both would be fast.

    If you don't want that info, then just read the actual article.

    The new Turbo though, that is insane performance. That's legitimate hypercar performance, and in one of the most drivable real performance cars. With the extra money you could make it even better.

    I'm not the biggest Porsche fan, but this is very impressive. Its pretty cool that you can see the results of competition even in the supercar market.
     
  25. darkswordsman17

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2004
    Messages:
    15,663
    Likes Received:
    35
    The transmission. Also, they aren't that much more powerful, only being about 50hp more. Considering only the 458 Italia weighs less than it, its not too surprising. Without the Porsche, the Ferrari would actually have been quite impressive on its own. I don't think its any surprise that those two cars are at the top, they're both lightweight and loaded with tech. They also probably have the best performance transmissions in road cars, aside from possibly the Veyron. Granted, they'll get looked down on because they aren't regular manuals, but that's what its going to take to make that next step.