BatmanNate
Lifer
- Jul 12, 2000
- 12,444
- 2
- 81
I can't imagine how I would have turned out if I'd been inadvertantly exposed to pornographic images at 13 years of age. The horror!!
Originally posted by: BatmanNate
I can't imagine how I would have turned out if I'd been inadvertantly exposed to pornographic images at 13 years of age. The horror!!
Originally posted by: illusion88
Why didnt she turn off the monitor or cover it up somehow?
Originally posted by: illusion88
Why didnt she turn off the monitor or cover it up somehow?
Originally posted by: senseamp
Originally posted by: illusion88
Why didnt she turn off the monitor or cover it up somehow?
Why didn't the school put filtering software to block those sites to begin with?
You can ask why or what all you want, she does not deserve to go to jail because some kids saw some naked pics. Period, end of story.
Principal Scott Fain said the computer lacked the latest firewall protection because a vendor?s bill had gone unpaid. ?I was shocked to see what made it through,? he said.
Originally posted by: slsmnaz
Originally posted by: senseamp
Originally posted by: illusion88
Why didnt she turn off the monitor or cover it up somehow?
Why didn't the school put filtering software to block those sites to begin with?
You can ask why or what all you want, she does not deserve to go to jail because some kids saw some naked pics. Period, end of story.
Amazing the school is being prosecuted too
Principal Scott Fain said the computer lacked the latest firewall protection because a vendor?s bill had gone unpaid. ?I was shocked to see what made it through,? he said.
Her sentence would be stupid but I'm constantly amazed by the people here who think porn should be a class taught in middle school.
Originally posted by: JS80
1) the prosecutor is a douche
2) the jury is full of douches
3) the appellate court will overturn
4) lawyers win $$$
Originally posted by: JS80
3) the appellate court will overturn
Originally posted by: ElFenix
Originally posted by: JS80
3) the appellate court will overturn
what makes you think so?
?What is extraordinary is the prosecution admitted there was no search made for spyware ? an incredible blunder akin to not checking for fingerprints at a crime scene,? Alex Eckelberry, president of a Florida software company, wrote recently in the local newspaper. ?When a pop-up occurs on a computer, it will get shown as a visited Web site, and no ?physical click? is necessary.?
Originally posted by: CPA
While I agree any jailtime would be overkill, please don't ask what damage is inflicted if you don't have young children.
Originally posted by: Linflas
Originally posted by: ElFenix
Originally posted by: JS80
3) the appellate court will overturn
what makes you think so?
This is probably a pretty good start:
?What is extraordinary is the prosecution admitted there was no search made for spyware ? an incredible blunder akin to not checking for fingerprints at a crime scene,? Alex Eckelberry, president of a Florida software company, wrote recently in the local newspaper. ?When a pop-up occurs on a computer, it will get shown as a visited Web site, and no ?physical click? is necessary.?
