• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

poor windows virtual machine performance

OogyWaWa

Senior member
got windows 7 x64 and installed windows VM. i've got a win7 32bit VM installed, but the performance is terrible. it recognizes the processor as 6mhz... it is particularly slow when installing stuff

host:
3.4ghz phenom II w/ AMD-V enabled
8gb ddr3
dual ssd in raid 0
VMs run on a 2tb HDD
win7 x64

guest:
win7 x32
2gb ram
expandable file system
processor?? can you not change this in winVM? i know in VMware you can set number of cores, etc...

should i just trash it and go back to VMware?
 
i decided to install vmware workstation 7 (trial) and see how it worked. it is now obvious MS still sucks at VMs for desktops... VMware can use all 4 cores, all the mem i want, and its fast as hell. I'm getting near native performance. I'm sure if i moved my VM to my SSDs it would be a lot quicker, but I'm happy. Time to get rid of windows VM 😛
 
I wouldn't be surprised if VMware was faster than VPC, but not to the extent that you seem to be seeing.

As for Virtual Box, I'd give it a try since VMware Workstation is also a lot more expensive. Or VMware Server even, which is also free but doesn't have all of the same features as Workstation.
 
I use virtual box at school and Im runninng server2003 and 3 vista clients in vitual mode. I tried some of the other but they seem to have a problem dealing with this many virtual machines.

Alan
 
Back
Top