Poll: Who to invade next after Syria

[glugglug]

Who do you think George War Bush will claim has the WMD after Syria?

Edit: Libya and North Korea added.

 

[Alistar7]

Originally posted by: glugglug
Who do you think George War Bush will claim has the WMD after Syria?

If Syria has none why did they offer to dismantle their programs in 1999 if Israel would eliminate their nuclear program?

Funny the same EU coutnires that were Saddams PRIMARY WMD suppliers are also Syria's and Egypt's, why is the EU doing this anyway?

Are you going to have the nerve to suggest the are no terrorist organizations in Syria as well?

 

[Alistar7]

What will the anti-US, anti-war, anti-Bush crowd make up next to justify their misguided perceptions and obvious ignorance of the facts?

 

[Red Dawn]

Originally posted by: glugglug
Who do you think George War Bush will claim has the WMD after Syria?

What do you mean after Syria? We aren't going to invade Syria, the American Public wouldn't support it. Now Israel might and we would back them but I don't even think that would be popular amongst Isaelis.

If we do anything regarding Syria it will be sanctions at the very most.

 

[Alistar7]

Originally posted by: Red Dawn

Originally posted by: glugglug
Who do you think George War Bush will claim has the WMD after Syria?

What do you mean after Syria? We aren't going to invade Syria, the American Public wouldn't support it. Now Israel might and we would back them but I don't even think that would be popular amongst Isaelis.

If we do anything regarding Syria it will be sanctions at the very most.

I have seen polls that show Americans would support action against Syria if it could be proven they assisted Iraq in this war with weapons or they are harboring regime members.

The fact that every major terrorist group has official offices there doesn't help their cause either..

I do agree with you though that sanctions will be the first step, they have also signaled their willingness to undergo inspections, as has Iran and NK recently....

 

[guigui38]

well israel is the one who has the most wmd in this area

 

[Alistar7]

Originally posted by: guigui38
well israel is the one who has the most wmd in this area

That's wrong, sorry, they are the only nuclear power but they certainly do not hold the majority of WMD.

The same EU countries that were the main suppliers for Iraq also supply Iran, Egypt, and Syria, what a suprise the biggest one is France, a country whose anti-Israel stance is quite documented.

 

[guigui38]

Originally posted by: Alistar7

Originally posted by: guigui38
well israel is the one who has the most wmd in this area

That's wrong, sorry, they are the only nuclear power but they certainly do not hold the majority of WMD.

The same EU countries that were the main suppliers for Iraq also supply Iran, Egypt, and Syria, what a suprise the biggest one is France, a country whose anti-Israel stance is quite documented.

well quite documented by pro israel
not so long time ago we wered acused of racism against arab
didnt know anyone could change his mind so quickly
america gave lots of information to israel
i think america is one of the only country who didnt sign the treaty againt personnal mines no?

 

[Nitemare]

I think the whole area needs to clean up their act. It's their fault we are so buddy buddy with Israel

 

[Red Dawn]

Originally posted by: Alistar7

Originally posted by: Red Dawn

Originally posted by: glugglug
Who do you think George War Bush will claim has the WMD after Syria?

What do you mean after Syria? We aren't going to invade Syria, the American Public wouldn't support it. Now Israel might and we would back them but I don't even think that would be popular amongst Isaelis.

If we do anything regarding Syria it will be sanctions at the very most.

I have seen polls that show Americans would support action against Syria if it could be proven they assisted Iraq in this war with weapons or they are harboring regime members.

The fact that every major terrorist group has official offices there doesn't help their cause either..

I do agree with you though that sanctions will be the first step, they have also signaled their willingness to undergo inspections, as has Iran and NK recently....

Got a link to that poll?

 

[glugglug]

If the WMD were moved to Syria, we would no doubt have seen satellite photos of them being moved.

Anyway, if you were Saddam, wouldn't Saudi Arabia be a much more enticing place to flee to then Syria, as it has so much less chance of being searched by the US?

 

[Alistar7]

Originally posted by: guigui38

Originally posted by: Alistar7

Originally posted by: guigui38
well israel is the one who has the most wmd in this area

That's wrong, sorry, they are the only nuclear power but they certainly do not hold the majority of WMD.

The same EU countries that were the main suppliers for Iraq also supply Iran, Egypt, and Syria, what a suprise the biggest one is France, a country whose anti-Israel stance is quite documented.

well quite documented by pro israel
not so long time ago we wered acused of racism against arab
didnt know anyone could change his mind so quickly
america gave lots of information to israel
i think america is one of the only country who didnt sign the treaty againt personnal mines no?

Yes, but our mines turn off after time, unlike most used, we also use ours to secure a border, then remove them when we leave if they are not timed.

France's official position is pro Palestinian, there are articles linked on this forum that show how their govt views Israel....

 

[Alistar7]

Originally posted by: glugglug
If the WMD were moved to Syria, we would no doubt have seen satellite photos of them being moved.

Anyway, if you were Saddam, wouldn't Saudi Arabia be a much more enticing place to flee to then Syria, as it has so much less chance of being searched by the US?

We have forces stationed there, they are one of our longest and strongest allies in the region, not too mention the terrorist groups that operate there are diametrically opposed to Saddam's views, the ones in Syria (pro-Plo) are far more similar to his line of thinking.

 

[guigui38]

Originally posted by: Alistar7

Originally posted by: guigui38

Originally posted by: Alistar7

Originally posted by: guigui38
well israel is the one who has the most wmd in this area

That's wrong, sorry, they are the only nuclear power but they certainly do not hold the majority of WMD.

The same EU countries that were the main suppliers for Iraq also supply Iran, Egypt, and Syria, what a suprise the biggest one is France, a country whose anti-Israel stance is quite documented.

well quite documented by pro israel
not so long time ago we wered acused of racism against arab
didnt know anyone could change his mind so quickly
america gave lots of information to israel
i think america is one of the only country who didnt sign the treaty againt personnal mines no?

Yes, but our mines turn off after time, unlike most used, we also use ours to secure a border, then remove them when we leave if they are not timed.

France's official position is pro Palestinian, there are articles linked on this forum that show how their govt views Israel....

my god......
instead of linking to paper claiming france is anti semitic show paper with fact and not propaganda
show me a official speech of a government member claiming they are against israel.
france isnot pro palestina
france is for the peace in this area
france is AGAINST terrorism against israel
we suffered a lot of terrorism so that we cant accept it

 

[TheCorm]

Other - Nobody.

I don't think going on a worldwide conquering spree is such a great idea.

But...Canada...LOL!...i'm sure they'd love that!

 

[Marshallj]

Originally posted by: glugglug
If the WMD were moved to Syria, we would no doubt have seen satellite photos of them being moved.

Anyway, if you were Saddam, wouldn't Saudi Arabia be a much more enticing place to flee to then Syria, as it has so much less chance of being searched by the US?

Satellites are predictable. The orbits of most spy satellites are already known, and you can predict with accuracy when it will be overhead. So you do your moving when the satellite isn't overhead.

I'm sure that there are some that are still not known, but that will be few compared to many known ones. Geosynchronous orbits are usually too far to be any use for a spy satellite. A normal orbit can be around 300 miles, while geosynchronous orbits are around 30,000 miles.

 

[Banana]

Belgium--Gotta safeguard the world's only source of them delicious waffles!

 

[AtomicDude512]

France next possible.

Read my other thread.

 

[guigui38]

Originally posted by: AtomicDude512
France next possible.

Read my other thread.

yes we have a lot a wmd
we call them cheese lol

 

[Conky]

Originally posted by: Red Dawn

Originally posted by: glugglug
Who do you think George War Bush will claim has the WMD after Syria?

What do you mean after Syria? We aren't going to invade Syria, the American Public wouldn't support it. Now Israel might and we would back them but I don't even think that would be popular amongst Isaelis.

If we do anything regarding Syria it will be sanctions at the very most.

Don't make replies like this that make sense. Go back to assuming the worst about the USA and Bush.

 

[bjc112]

Originally posted by: glugglug
Who do you think George War Bush will claim has the WMD after Syria?

Considering we aren't eve going to attack Syria...

Secretary of State Colin Powell, seeking to tone down hawkish rhetoric toward Syria, said Tuesday the Bush administration has expressed concerns about Syrian actions, but has no plan for a military move against the Damascus government.

From
Fox

We should just lock this thread,

Its taking up space.

 

[aznparty]

Originally posted by: Alistar7

Originally posted by: glugglug
If the WMD were moved to Syria, we would no doubt have seen satellite photos of them being moved.

Anyway, if you were Saddam, wouldn't Saudi Arabia be a much more enticing place to flee to then Syria, as it has so much less chance of being searched by the US?

We have forces stationed there, they are one of our longest and strongest allies in the region, not too mention the terrorist groups that operate there are diametrically opposed to Saddam's views, the ones in Syria (pro-Plo) are far more similar to his line of thinking.

They might be diametrically opposed to Saddam but it don't mean they are friendly against the US! I seem to believe most of the ppl who flew the planes into the WTC was Saudi nationals? And what did the US say to them? Don't do it again? Even if the terrorist groups were against Saddam, then its ok to have them as long as they are the US's allies? That sounds like state sponsered terrorism to me. It's very simple why we attacking Syria, yes they might have some WMD, yes they might have one or two Iraqi leader, but the real point is Rummy and Bushy don't like Syria and they believe they can take on Syria thats why they want to attack. If Saddam ran to NK, US gonna attack them?

 

[Tates]

You forgot Libya & North Korea

 

[T2T III]

Originally posted by: Red Dawn

Originally posted by: glugglug
Who do you think George War Bush will claim has the WMD after Syria?

What do you mean after Syria? We aren't going to invade Syria, the American Public wouldn't support it. Now Israel might and we would back them but I don't even think that would be popular amongst Isaelis.

If we do anything regarding Syria it will be sanctions at the very most.

Maybe, not a full invasion. However, I'd suspect that we have some CIA folks (in addition to those already there) go inside and check things out. Should they happen to come upon one of the "55 most wanted" - then they can document it and take 'em out.

 

[T2T III]

Originally posted by: Tates
You forgot Libya & North Korea

Libya has been somewhat quiet since 1986 when Ronald Reagan launched a quick attack on them. How quiet? I'm not sure. Apparently, they are still supporting terrorism - but, not as publically as they were earlier.