RabidMongoose
Lifer
- Aug 14, 2001
- 11,061
- 0
- 0
Oh i get it just fine, the USSC has ruled that marriage is a right, that means that per the constitution itself it IS a right since their job is to interpret the constitution.
Um, sure, but again it's how the conservative justices will frame the right in question.
And no, you may not know this but NO state can legally construct legislation that goes against the federal constitution.
We haven't even begun discussing what happens after the repeal of state law... you really don't have a fucking clue about the US legal system, do you?
Thanks for the obvious. And I do know about the US legal system considering that I am an American lawyer. I'd say that I know a hell of a lot more about it than you do considering that you're a subject of the British queen. It's quite obvious that you're reciting a small portion of one case and think that conservative justices have no other constitutional analysis that they can apply. They can easily distinguish it to follow their own conservative agenda.
Hell, some freaking state supreme courts didn't even bother to cite to Loving v. Virginia when they UPHELD same sex marriage.
I do and i have presented knowledge to you, take it in, realise that it is fact, cement it and rid yourself of your delusions.
Ah well, i've tried to help you, i've got better things to do than to educate Americans on their constitution (which is just a god damn piece of paper) and legal system...
Good luck though, when you reach high school i'm sure you can even have an argument without baiting or trolling, not that it will make sense since you refuse to learn from the information handed to you but still, you could nod and perhaps get away with that withouth shouting "QEEEN" like you had writing tourettes.
I'm going to hold my thumbs for you, you can doit, i'm sure of it!
Again, all you've stated was "Loving v. Virginia", haven't been able to display any knowledge of constitutional analysis or principles, and you don't even state the correct constitutional terminology in your posts. I agree with you about the overall issue of same sex marriage, but you are so lacking in any legal or constitutional knowledge that you should be embarrassed.
Go back to your queen. It's quite obvious that you have no clue about a real and actual constitution.
Last edited: