• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Poll: Who makes the best TV tuner cards?

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
I wish someone would do a big comparison between all of them. Showing the quality of captures between them and features and stuff. I hear the conexant 10bit chips are the best now though but im not sure.
 
Hauppauge has good hardware, but lousy drivers. Or maybe the word lousy doesn't do them justice. Maybe "Alpha drivers packaged as final versions" is more accurate.
I think they put a good bit of money into their hardware development - they do MPEG2 encoding in the hardware, which greatly reduces the CPU load. You can encode full-screen MPEG2 at high bitrates with very low CPU usage. Their PVR-PCI was excellently designed with one problem - they dropped driver development of it completely.
rolleye.gif
It displayed live TV in said mode; when doing timeshifting, it showed an MPEG stream in the video window.
The newer, and still "supported" PVR-250 and 350 do things differently - they ALWAYS display an MPEG stream. Now the PVR-350 does have hardware MPEG2 decoding, however it is only active through the S-video output port, which I think was a bit of a dumb thing on their part. But otherwise, the PVR-350 is an excellent piece of hardware - it seems like advanced technology for a consumer-level card.
If they could produce decent, stable drivers, I would not hesitate to recommend this card. Whether that helps or not...up to you. Check the link in my sig for the PVR forum to get an idea of the problems with the drivers.
 
I've had 3 TV Cards in the past few years. ATi TV Wonder, Leadtek Winfast 2000XP Deluxe, And currently am using the Asus TVFM7133. The Asus card definatly has better quality images than the ATi And Leadtek card but the software kinda sucks. It takes a while for it to load up and change channels and is kind of confusing.
The Leadtek has good quality images and very easy to use software and is a good value for under 50 bucks.
The ATi card was a joke, the image quality was decent but not great and I couldn't get the recording software to work on my computer. This was the ATi TV Wonder Retail not VE edition.
 
i have an ati 9500 already. is it possible to add, say a leadtek 2000 to my motherboard and run dual monitors... 1 from the ati, and 1 from the leadtek?
 
Originally posted by: Vernor
So if you have digital cable or sat, do you just get a cheap capture card with no tuner ?

Yup, digital sat/cable use propreitary encoding that regular tuners can't decode. Just hook the video out from the box to the video in on the card. (I suppose if you want sound, you could hook that up also)
 
Originally posted by: substance12
i have an ati 9500 already. is it possible to add, say a leadtek 2000 to my motherboard and run dual monitors... 1 from the ati, and 1 from the leadtek?

you should be able to run dual monitors from the 9500 alone, unless you want dual dvi.
 
Back
Top