Siddhartha
Lifer
- Oct 17, 1999
- 12,505
- 3
- 81
Originally posted by: conjur
Where's the only accurate option?
"He doesn't fvcking care! Wants us all to die!"
Originally posted by: conjur
Where's the only accurate option?
"He doesn't fvcking care! Wants us all to die!"
Yeah but the Dub's "Bull in a Closet" Diplomacy is a disaster and has hurt us in the war against terrorism. Frankly his and his handlers insistence in invading and occupying Iraq has really hurt our credibility since the reasons given by the Dub and his cohort Blair has proven to be false.Originally posted by: bozack
Originally posted by: Red Dawn
I don't know about that. Bush probably has done more to help Al Qaeda's recruiting than Bin Laden himself. Plus Kerry probably would be more likely to bridge the differences between Western Europe and America which could only help on the war against terrorism
With re. recruitment maybe, however I don't necessarily agree with the rest of it...if anything the only way Kerry would bridge the gap between Eu and the US is by catering to every whim and desire EU wants, further pussifying this nation...it is good to do some brown-nosing from time to time but my fear is that with Kerrie the term bending over backwards will be given new meaning.
Originally posted by: xxxxxJohnGaltxxxxx
Originally posted by: tallest1
GW Bush. Bin Laden would've been long dead if Bush hadn't decided to spend loads of money to fight "all evil" simultaneously.
How so? Clinton spent nothing fighting against the terrorist during his 8 year term...didn't spend "loads of money" fighting ANY "evil simultaneously"...bombed our embassy, the U.S.S. Cole, the towers in Saudi, et al....all while he was shoving cigars up interns crotches...so your assertion that we would have had him by now should be on the receiving end of that $510B toilet paper...full of sh*t, sir.
Originally posted by: xxxxxJohnGaltxxxxx
Originally posted by: tallest1
GW Bush. Bin Laden would've been long dead if Bush hadn't decided to spend loads of money to fight "all evil" simultaneously.
How so? Clinton spent nothing fighting against the terrorist during his 8 year term...didn't spend "loads of money" fighting ANY "evil simultaneously"...bombed our embassy, the U.S.S. Cole, the towers in Saudi, et al....all while he was shoving cigars up interns crotches...so your assertion that we would have had him by now should be on the receiving end of that $510B toilet paper...full of sh*t, sir.
Originally posted by: MonstaThrilla
Originally posted by: XZeroII
Originally posted by: WinstonSmith
Originally posted by: XZeroII
Kerry, obviously. Once Kerry gets in, there will be no money left for toilet paper in the whitehouse for all the money he is planning to spend, let along going after OBL.
Just how is he going to get a Republican controlled Congress to spend that money?
This should be good.
Why don't you ask that question in a Kerry thread? Watch everyone squirm as they start chanting, "Anyone But Bush!"
Why don't you answer his question instead of deflecting? The truth is, most of us who will vote for Kerry in November know full well who we're voting into the White House. We have no dreams of liberal glory.
Originally posted by: Gaard
Originally posted by: lozina
I think that's a valid question in response to your statement and you are 'squirming' away. So just how will Kerry get this passed a Republican congress?
I see Commander has decided to bail instead of responding. Good job Commander.![]()
Originally posted by: XZeroII
Actually I have other things to do. I just post here when I have a minute, then check back when I get another minute.Originally posted by: GaardI see Commander has decided to bail instead of responding. Good job Commander.Originally posted by: lozina I think that's a valid question in response to your statement and you are 'squirming' away. So just how will Kerry get this passed a Republican congress?![]()
Actually I spend half of my day getting 'sensual massages' and the other half wondering where half the day went.Originally posted by: Perknose
Originally posted by: XZeroII
<STRONG>Actually I have other things to do</STRONG>. I just post here when I have a minute, then check back when I get another minute.Originally posted by: GaardI see Commander has decided to bail instead of responding. Good job Commander.Originally posted by: lozina I think that's a valid question in response to your statement and you are 'squirming' away. So just how will Kerry get this passed a Republican congress?![]()
Mom wants you to clean your room . . . and those zits aren't just gonna pop themselves!![]()
Originally posted by: FrodoB
Obviously Osama wants the candidate that will bend over and take it up the rear from Islamic terrorism - John Kerry.
