Could Osama be the mysterious foreign leader? We have two choices come November--give Osama want he wants, or give Osama what he doesn't want...4 more years of hide and seek, though I suspect he'll be found much sooner.
*POLL* Who do you think Osama Bin Laden wants to win in November?
- Thread starter xxxxxJohnGaltxxxxx
- Start date
sMiLeYz
Platinum Member
- Feb 3, 2003
- 2,696
- 0
- 76
Yup, you're exactly right on the money. Bush already gave Osama the major thing he wanted -- the pull out from Prince Sultan Airbase in Saudi Arabia. Further, Bush is tearing down alliances rather than building them up, and a rise of nationalism has occurred throughout the world, leading to even more polarization. The Western nations are more split apart than they ever have been since WW2. I think Osama is getting alot of what he wanted.
I would say President Bush. Osama knows his days are numbered and the best hope for his struggle to go on is to continue to hatred and animosity towarsd the US. President Bush appears to be doing the best job at doing that.
Hayabusa Rider
Admin Emeritus & Elite Member
- Jan 26, 2000
- 50,879
- 4,268
- 126
Just how is he going to get a Republican controlled Congress to spend that money?
This should be good.
Oh, I really don't know if Bin Laden cares, but if he does, most likely he wants Bush. Look how successful Bush was in aiding the influx of terrorists into Iraq.
Red Dawn
Elite Member
- Jun 4, 2001
- 57,529
- 3
- 0
I don't know about that. Bush probably has done more to help Al Qaeda's recruiting than Bin Laden himself. Plus Kerry probably would be more likely to bridge the differences between Western Europe and America which could only help on the war against terrorism
Why don't you answer his question instead of deflecting? The truth is, most of us who will vote for Kerry in November know full well who we're voting into the White House. We have no dreams of liberal glory.
your poll is slanted twards the bigest-line being bush
whatadweeb.
i'm going to have to side with conjur on this one;
i'm going to have to side with conjur on this one;
GW Bush. Bin Laden would've been long dead if Bush hadn't decided to spend loads of money to fight "all evil" simultaneously.
Ben laden's group isn't the only one that wasnts to do things like sep 11;
putting an end to the flow of terrorists is Moor important than pouting a quick end to ben laden's life.
How so? Clinton spent nothing fighting against the terrorist during his 8 year term...didn't spend "loads of money" fighting ANY "evil simultaneously"...bombed our embassy, the U.S.S. Cole, the towers in Saudi, et al....all while he was shoving cigars up interns crotches...so your assertion that we would have had him by now should be on the receiving end of that $510B toilet paper...full of sh*t, sir.
With re. recruitment maybe, however I don't necessarily agree with the rest of it...if anything the only way Kerry would bridge the gap between Eu and the US is by catering to every whim and desire EU wants, further pussifying this nation...it is good to do some brown-nosing from time to time but my fear is that with Kerrie the term bending over backwards will be given new meaning.
Same stupid argument as the "Spainish election helped the terrorists" argument.
Who cares what Osama Bin Laden wants. He doesn't want Hitler, maybe I should write-in Hitler.
One should not vote based on what someone else wants. One should vote based on what one thinks is right.
Who cares what Osama Bin Laden wants. He doesn't want Hitler, maybe I should write-in Hitler.
One should not vote based on what someone else wants. One should vote based on what one thinks is right.
TRENDING THREADS
-
Discussion Zen 5 Speculation (EPYC Turin and Strix Point/Granite Ridge - Ryzen 9000)- Started by DisEnchantment
- Replies: 25K
-
Discussion Intel Meteor, Arrow, Lunar & Panther Lakes + WCL Discussion Threads
- Started by Tigerick
- Replies: 24K
-
Discussion Intel current and future Lakes & Rapids thread- Started by TheF34RChannel
- Replies: 23K
-
-
Facebook
Twitter