Originally posted by: Wuffsunie
Is this a thinly veiled "ends justify the means" argument?
Originally posted by: minendo
Originally posted by: Wuffsunie
Is this a thinly veiled "ends justify the means" argument?
Actually this is a question that pretty makes or breaks an interview.
Originally posted by: PliotronX
The glass is half full.
Originally posted by: Dr Smooth
Are you asking if the ends justify the means?
No.
Originally posted by: AvesPKS
It depends on what you're talking about. But from an office perspective, the process is more important.
Commerically, Businesses are like viruses. They need to infect or they jsut die out. THis is why the means are many times irrelevant. Many times it comes down to unethical measn that people are willing to go through with for gain or plain survival.
Originally posted by: Goosemaster
Originally posted by: AvesPKS
It depends on what you're talking about. But from an office perspective, the process is more important.
Not necessarily.
If we are taking aboutend results of the same caliber and of the same finesses, why would means even matter after if it were lets say, a simple project that was done for a client and is never to be dealed with again? {run-on heaven}
Originally posted by: Goosemaster
Originally posted by: Dr Smooth
Are you asking if the ends justify the means?
No.
The fact is that you are comparing social and commercial enviroments.
That is foolish at best as they operate on different principle.
The end CAN justify the means just as easily as it cannot. Stop arguing over a self-inflicted paradox.
THe fact remains that socially, there is no "end" as familes continue to reproduce etc, at least for the most part.
Commerically, Businesses are like viruses. They need to infect or they jsut die out. THis is why the means are many times irrelevant. Many times it comes down to unethical measn that people are willing to go through with for gain or plain survival.
Stop arguing,. YOu are making hte job of google's bots jsut that mcuh harder.
<---trying to stay on the bots' good side.
Originally posted by: Dr Smooth
Originally posted by: Goosemaster
Originally posted by: Dr Smooth
Are you asking if the ends justify the means?
No.
The fact is that you are comparing social and commercial enviroments.
That is foolish at best as they operate on different principle.
The end CAN justify the means just as easily as it cannot. Stop arguing over a self-inflicted paradox.
THe fact remains that socially, there is no "end" as familes continue to reproduce etc, at least for the most part.
Commerically, Businesses are like viruses. They need to infect or they jsut die out. THis is why the means are many times irrelevant. Many times it comes down to unethical measn that people are willing to go through with for gain or plain survival.
Stop arguing,. YOu are making hte job of google's bots jsut that mcuh harder.
<---trying to stay on the bots' good side.
I read your reply two times and I am not sure I understand what your point is.
How is my post "foolish"?
Does the end always justify the means?
NO.
Originally posted by: DrNoobie
For me, the process. Using medicine for an example, it doesn't matter if you do everything right, you can't save everyone. There's a factor governing life that's out of our control (whether that be luck, fate, or God is up to you), but you need to understand that process so that you can save the ones who can be saved. Sometimes it's just their time to go, but without the correct process you will save far less than you would if you used the correct process.
