<<. You can say its a better lube and but it won't be signigant in the long wrong, etc all you want but I can flat out promise you its better for my car>>
OK, maybe for YOUR car. I'm talking in general. Besides, how many turbo cars are being made today anyway? Not many in comparison to all others.
<<. If I take conventional oil in my car go out and drive at WOT then just turn off the engine killing hte oil pump my oil is going to sit in the oil feed lines to the turbo and the sulfur is going to cause it to coke up. >>
And you really do this? Does anyone? Besides, I hate to break it to you, but there are millions of turbo diesels that go hundreds of thousands of miles without turbo failure and nearly all of them use conventional oil. There are plenty of turbo gas engines that have well over 100k miles using conventional oil. Your average car isn't going to last much over 125k miles anyway, and it takes that long or more for the synthetic oil to make a difference in wear.
<<Synthetic oil doesnt coke like conventional does so I dont have this problem. >>
Conventional oil doesn't really have that much of a problem gumming up anymore, not with all the specs. it has to meet now.
<<Think for the average turbo car owner that replacing a turbo is gonna be about $1000 or more in parts and a heck of a lot of labor. Try to tell me its not worth an extra $10 an oil change to not only save my money but also downtime without my car! >>
Again, yes, for YOUR car maybe. I recall saying if I had an expensive car like a Vette or something I'd use synthetic also, and I suppose that would apply to any sporty, turbo-type cars also. My position that synthetic is a waste of money was meant mainly for your average car, such as an Explorer, Accord, etc....and I stand firmly behind that statement. If you change your oil every 3k miles like you're supposed to, you will never, repeat, NEVER have an oil related failure.
Also, in reference particularly to American built cars nowadays, don't waste your money(on synth. oil) They aren't going to last 2-300k miles anyway no matter what oil you put in them. I hate to say this, but for the most part it's true. I know everyone probably knows someone with a 1995 Ford or Chevy with 200k miles, but you don't see very many.
<<You can't make up for how easily synthetic oil pours in chilly weather compared to coventional oil with more frequent changes either>>
Yeah right, in 40 degrees below zero weather. The very few people who actually drive in conditions like that all have their engine block heaters plugged in all night anyway, so low temp viscosity is irrelevant to them.
<<Any offroaders here who know why its super good to run synthetic gear lube in your pumpkins? When water and conventional oil combine, say during a water crossing if you happen to have a leaky seal you wind up with an emulsion that doesnt lubricate and that just lets your parts grind to death. With synthetic oil the water just sinks to the bottom of the diff, >>
Well, I'll agree somewhat with synthetic oil in differentials. You don't have to change those fluids except every 100k miles or so, so the cost doesn't really matter.
The water doesn't just sink to the bottom of the diff, though. That's impossible, since the ring gear stirs everything up. The water won't contaminate the synth. oil as badly. That being said, I've owned 5 Jeeps, 3 Broncos, and several 4x4 trucks, and in the quite extensive 4 wheeling I've done,(mostly in mud and water) I've never seen anyone get water in a diff. or any other drivetrain component. Actually, the most common thing I've seen happen is people getting water sucked into the engine with varying amounts of damage occurring, which no oil can help with