lol, no. You quoted part of the conclusion and are so incompetent you didn't understand what it meant. The conclusion has two parts:
Part 1:
This means that all charges he pleaded guilty to are affirmed, as are their sentences. This includes the charge he committed entirely while in a retired status.
Part 2 is what you quoted, and are SUPPLEMENTAL orders slightly modifying two of the five charged he pleaded guilty to. From the intro to the opinion:
And again, the opinion explicitly states one of the charges he pleaded guilty to was committed entirely while he was in a retired status, although the opinion is also clear that such a distinction is irrelevant because retired military members are subject to the UCMJ.
In case you need another example of court martial for an offense committed in its entirety while in a retired status here you go:
The U.S. Supreme Court has upheld the Defense Department's authority to prosecute retired service members for crimes they commit, even after retirement.
taskandpurpose.com
You are entirely, 100% wrong and there's no escaping it. Because you're mentally ill you probably can't admit it, but that's your problem.