• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Poll: should hybrid vehicles be allowed in HOV lanes?

F

FreshPrince

Diamond Member
I see that they're starting to allow alternative fuel vehicles on HOV lanes...should hybrids fall in the same category?

-FP
 
i think so...at least for a while to help convince people to buy them...considering what they do so far as emissions per capita...i think its ok
 
one quick point for me to make... does the engergy that the motor use up generate pollution in its creation?... if yes, then no.
 
No - the HOV lane is supposed to reduce freeway congestion, not just air pollution. Hybrid cars with one person in them do nothing for congestion.
 
Originally posted by: Toastedlightly
one quick point for me to make... does the engergy that the motor use up generate pollution in its creation?... if yes, then no.
Click to expand...

That's a ridiculous argument. If a car is able to travel in a HOV lane ONLY when it creates no pollution at all, then no cars would be allowed in a HOV lane, ever. A carpool reduces pollution, just like a hybrid does. It does not eliminate it.
 
Originally posted by: notfred
No - the HOV lane is supposed to reduce freeway congestion, not just air pollution. Hybrid cars with one person in them do nothing for congestion.
Click to expand...
^ What he said.

ZV
 
Certainly not hybrids by default! GM's making some full size trucks with hybrid engines to improve performance, not really mileage. I'd say any high-mileage car should be allowed to use the HOV lanes. Motorcycles are usually allowed in them. If you've got a car getting the same mpg as a motorcycle, certainly it should be allowed.

I remember Ford complaining that CA wouldn't let its hybrid Escape in the HOV lanes, only the hybrid Civic and Prius. They called it favoritism to Japanese manufacturers. The truth was that the stupid Escape couldn't make the mileage cutoff.

---------

Here's the link:

http://www.detnews.com/2004/au...0408/25/c03-253354.htm

The cutoff was 45 mpg, the Escape made 31. *Normal* Civics get ~38.
 
I don't think HOV lanes reduce congestion...if anything, they add to it. With all those HOV cars weaving all the say to the right lane to exit the highway...it causes more congestion.

I would say requiring 18 wheelers and semi's to travel in 1 lane only would probably reduce 80% of the congestion...
 
No, and those lanes are dumb anyway. Less stupid rules, MORE DAMN LANES. The country has exploded in terms of traffic in the past few decades with almost no significant road building to show for it. Result is serious congestion.
 
Hell no. If anything, it should be the other way around. Hybrids are only more efficient than non-hybrids in start-and-stop driving situations. During highway speed cruising, hybrids can actually be less efficient than non-hybrids.
 
Originally posted by: Vic
Hell no. If anything, it should be the other way around. Hybrids are only more efficient than non-hybrids in start-and-stop driving situations. During highway speed cruising, hybrids can actually be less efficient than non-hybrids.
Click to expand...
Actually, I retract my answer. Vic brings up an EXCELLENT point. Most hybrids actually get WORSE fuel economy at highway speeds, and they're made for stop-and-go driving. They shouldn't be allowed in HOV lanes. Good point, Vic.
 
In California natural gas and electric cars are allowed in the HOV lanes (I have a natural gas Crown Victoria I commute in). They are allowed into the hov lanes as an inventive to purchase and use. The hybrids are currently having no trouble selling (in many places there are waiting lists) and don't require any additional inconvience (I have to go to a CNG fueling station, not just any gas station). As such, I don't think they need this inventive to get people to buy them.

Bill
 
Originally posted by: Babbles
Yeah, if they meet the requirement of "High Occupancy."
Click to expand...


Ahhh. High Occupancy Vehicle.

What amount of people does "High Occupancy" require? And if it's just the AMOUNT of riders, I don't see why they shouldn't be allowed.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top