Originally posted by: Infohawk
Can you add a "who cares?" voting option?
Originally posted by: Train
I cant stand it when people obsess with a celbrities court case.
Get a life.
Originally posted by: Train
I cant stand it when people obsess with a celbrities court case.
Get a life.
Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken
The thing that struck me about the Peterson evidence was his boat. Here's a guy who had a large expensive house, an expensive car, and an expensive lifestyle; yet he bought some little pos used john boat to go fishing in (Shortly before his wife was killed he suddenly took an interest in fishing?)? It was completely out of character for types like him who liked the best of everything whether they can afford it or not. If that boat truly was for fishing Peterson would have bought a nice, expensive fishing boat, as was his normal style.
I think the jury will find him guilty purely because he is so full of lies and because of his affair with Amber. The dude is not human, he's pure snake.
He wasn't before but this case has made him one now, I guess.Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: Train
I cant stand it when people obsess with a celbrities court case.
Get a life.
How did this idiot become a Celebrity???
'If the boat don't fit you must acquit?'Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken
The thing that struck me about the Peterson evidence was his boat. Here's a guy who had a large expensive house, an expensive car, and an expensive lifestyle; yet he bought some little pos used john boat to go fishing in (Shortly before his wife was killed he suddenly took an interest in fishing?)? It was completely out of character for types like him who liked the best of everything whether they can afford it or not. If that boat truly was for fishing Peterson would have bought a nice, expensive fishing boat, as was his normal style.
I think the jury will find him guilty purely because he is so full of lies and because of his affair with Amber. The dude is not human, he's pure snake.
Just as OJ's flight of fancy was out of character but he got away with Murder.
Maybe, maybe not. Since I'm not on the jury though I can speculate based on experience and I know a lot of guys who are just like Scott Peterson. When they go golfing, even though they rarely golf, they buy a $2000 set of clubs. They lease a Jag or Merc or Bimmer. They live in a house that costs more than they can afford. All their clothes are upscale designer brands. They cruise the bars frequently for a fresh piece of ego-boosting tail. Everything is about image for them. I've seen and read alot about Peterson and he's the exact same type of guy.Originally posted by: Kibbo
Who is this guy?
TLC, was the boat actively used in the murder? Even if it was, is your conjecture on the personality and actions regarding a man you've never met "beyond a reasonable doubt?"
Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken
Sure, it may be a sort of stereotyping, but I think the FBI and police have a different word for it - Profiling.
Originally posted by: dmcowen674
Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken
The thing that struck me about the Peterson evidence was his boat. Here's a guy who had a large expensive house, an expensive car, and an expensive lifestyle; yet he bought some little pos used john boat to go fishing in (Shortly before his wife was killed he suddenly took an interest in fishing?)? It was completely out of character for types like him who liked the best of everything whether they can afford it or not. If that boat truly was for fishing Peterson would have bought a nice, expensive fishing boat, as was his normal style.
I think the jury will find him guilty purely because he is so full of lies and because of his affair with Amber. The dude is not human, he's pure snake.
Just as OJ's flight of fancy was out of character but he got away with Murder.
Supposedly a couple of her hairs were found in the boat; a boat she had never been on and didn't even know existed.Originally posted by: Kibbo
Originally posted by: TastesLikeChicken
Sure, it may be a sort of stereotyping, but I think the FBI and police have a different word for it - Profiling.
I believe that profiling is mainly used as an investigative tool, not as evidence of guilt. Google "Guy Paul Morin" for a Canadian example of why. You didn't answer my first question, though, was the boat directly involved in the whole thing? I would google it myself, but I don't want to end up on Hard Copy Online. . .
Originally posted by: Infohawk
I was serious about the "who cares?" option. It would be interesting to see how much of P&N is interested in it.
Originally posted by: Infohawk
Can you add a "who cares?" voting option?