I knew that program didn't make changes to the Windows registry, but it seemed like something not to mess with without a guide or knowledge.
When I was referring to the memory performance, I wasn't comparing it to that of other via133a chipsets. I was talking about the Via133A chipset as a whole (hence my use of the word chipset in my first post).
I don't think it's crazy to call the memory performance sub-par. After all, it IS less than the BX chipset.
Yes, yes, I know that the BX chipset has had much more time to be refined, but I don't find that to be a terrific excuse.