You can see my core system in my profile below.
After careful consideration, I consider the
Athlon 600 (-> overclocked to 800 in the future) with SDRAM able to last me until 2003 before I feel the pinch. I invested a not inconsiderable sum for me in this base. I consider the
V3-2000 to be capable enough in 2D and 3D especially as I rarely play games. I think it's going to be some time before the majority of games are going to use T+L and bump mapping consistently.
My components are all great- I think. I even think my HD may make it.
The one thing I would allow to be changed is memory, I intend to get some more memory for my photo editing and putting into other systems.
I am a user who uses the internet mainly, but has tried programming, a little gaming, DVD films, CD burning, printing, scanning, and MIDI sequencing. Since my core speed copes with power to spare with everything, the slow way that software is developing in comparison to hardware makes me think that I will make it to 2003. My chess program already plays as strong as Kasparov (remember he lost to a Pentium 90 once).
So could you cope with this system if you had to till 2003? Not changing what's in the PC case except memory up to 192MB? Would you really be suffering not to play games at 100FPS on it? What would happen to you if you did have to use the system?
Yours, curious.
After careful consideration, I consider the
Athlon 600 (-> overclocked to 800 in the future) with SDRAM able to last me until 2003 before I feel the pinch. I invested a not inconsiderable sum for me in this base. I consider the
V3-2000 to be capable enough in 2D and 3D especially as I rarely play games. I think it's going to be some time before the majority of games are going to use T+L and bump mapping consistently.
My components are all great- I think. I even think my HD may make it.
The one thing I would allow to be changed is memory, I intend to get some more memory for my photo editing and putting into other systems.
I am a user who uses the internet mainly, but has tried programming, a little gaming, DVD films, CD burning, printing, scanning, and MIDI sequencing. Since my core speed copes with power to spare with everything, the slow way that software is developing in comparison to hardware makes me think that I will make it to 2003. My chess program already plays as strong as Kasparov (remember he lost to a Pentium 90 once).
So could you cope with this system if you had to till 2003? Not changing what's in the PC case except memory up to 192MB? Would you really be suffering not to play games at 100FPS on it? What would happen to you if you did have to use the system?
Yours, curious.