Poll: Kerry would be choice of terrorists

[heartsurgeon]

Asked, "Who do you think the terrorists would prefer to have as president," the independent poll found that 60 percent said Kerry while 25 percent said Bush.

washington times/UPI

 

[Hayabusa Rider]

Well, this is what people believed, not terrorists polled.

BTW, remind me, what percentage of people not too long ago felt that Saddam was involved/responsible for 9/11?

 

[CaptnKirk]

Any terrorist organization would want to do all that they can to keep Bush in office,
as it is clear that his methods and the tacts of his administration can do more
damage to the country with his policies from the inside than they can inflict from
the outside. 5 more years of the Bush type leadership (?) will doom the U.S.
in the eyes of the world - and that's their goal, discredit the Uniterd States and all
that we stand for in the world community.
Right now it will take many years of diplomatic repair to get the world to trust our policies.
Shameful.

 

[Tripleshot]

heartsurgeon (Which I doubt seriously this bafoon is) is getting really good at inventing anything said and contorting it to bash Kerry or Democrats WITHOUT HAVING FACTS TO BACK IT UP thinking that it puts shrub in a better, more respectable position.

I really thought for awhile he had more class. No respect for him now. He's just another dittohead with soooo much free time to post here, he can't possibly have a medical practice.

He makes a good troll though.

 

[sandorski]

Why wouldn't they rather choose the one who would fan the flames?

 

[josphII]

Originally posted by: sandorski
Why wouldn't they rather choose the one who would fan the flames?

theyd choose the one that would leave the house ungaurded

 

[fjord]

The defense condition level color scheme going up and down like a barber shop poll--That has to be solid gold for those who wish to advance fear and terror.

Very effective for both International and domestic purveyors of fear.

 

[TheBDB]

Of course they would prefer Kerry. Everyone knows he would hand over the country to Osama bin Laden the day after the inaguration, along with Korans for everyone to memorize.

 

[Hayabusa Rider]

Originally posted by: josphII

Originally posted by: sandorski
Why wouldn't they rather choose the one who would fan the flames?

theyd choose the one that would leave the house ungaurded

Too bad for them there isn't one of those running, isn't it?

 

[tallest1]

Originally posted by: josphII

Originally posted by: sandorski
Why wouldn't they rather choose the one who would fan the flames?

theyd choose the one that would leave the house ungaurded

And what the heck do you think happened on 9-11? Bush had hints of a terrorist attack since at least July '01 and the guy took a vacation!

 

[MonstaThrilla]

Originally posted by: tallest1

Originally posted by: josphII

Originally posted by: sandorski
Why wouldn't they rather choose the one who would fan the flames?

theyd choose the one that would leave the house ungaurded

And what the heck do you think happened on 9-11? Bush had hints of a terrorist attack since at least July '01 and the guy took a vacation!

[standard Bush-loving response]BJ Clinton![/standard Bush-loving response]

 

[arsbanned]

Heartsurgeons logic skills hard at work again.
Black/White.

tallest1 said:

And what the heck do you think happened on 9-11? Bush had hints of a terrorist attack since at least July '01 and the guy took a vacation!

Agreed. I cannot believe Bush is willing to make 9/11 the centerpiece of his re-election bid since he in fact allowed it TO HAPPEN IN THE FIRST PLACE.
Bizarre.

 

[syzygy]

Originally posted by: CaptnKirk
Any terrorist organization would want to do all that they can to keep Bush in office, as it is clear that his methods and the tacts of his administration can do more damage to the country with his policies from the inside than they can inflict from the outside. 5 more years of the Bush type leadership (?) will doom the U.S. in the eyes of the world - and that's their goal, discredit the Uniterd States and all that we stand for in the world community. Right now it will take many years of diplomatic repair to get the world to trust our policies.
Shameful.

not any terrorist organization . .. like these poor souls in chad. sadly, 43 of them
will not be among those cheering for bush in november's elections. and how they
must've thought they were safe in the far off wastelands of chad's interior.
they couldn't comprehend the will of the bush people to take the fight - a real
fight - to them wherever they may be, even remote chad.

U.S. military cargo planes have been delivering food, blankets and other supplies to forces
in Chad as they have fought Islamic militants there, and American surveillance aircraft have
helped track the militants, officials said yesterday.

 

[Corn]

BTW, remind me, what percentage of people not too long ago felt that Saddam was involved/responsible for 9/11?

I don't know the answer to that question Winston, why don't you provide it for us?

My educated guess would be less than 5% believed Saddam was involved/responsible for 9/11.

 

[Bowfinger]

Originally posted by: CaptnKirk
Any terrorist organization would want to do all that they can to keep Bush in office,
as it is clear that his methods and the tacts of his administration can do more
damage to the country with his policies from the inside than they can inflict from
the outside. 5 more years of the Bush type leadership (?) will doom the U.S.
in the eyes of the world - and that's their goal, discredit the Uniterd States and all
that we stand for in the world community.
Right now it will take many years of diplomatic repair to get the world to trust our policies.
Shameful.

:beer:

On the nose, Captn.

 

[FrodoB]

Originally posted by: Bowfinger

Originally posted by: CaptnKirk
Any terrorist organization would want to do all that they can to keep Bush in office,
as it is clear that his methods and the tacts of his administration can do more
damage to the country with his policies from the inside than they can inflict from
the outside. 5 more years of the Bush type leadership (?) will doom the U.S.
in the eyes of the world - and that's their goal, discredit the Uniterd States and all
that we stand for in the world community.
Right now it will take many years of diplomatic repair to get the world to trust our policies.
Shameful.

:beer:

On the nose, Captn.

Typical idiotic responses. Collectively you two have the IQ of a monkey.
This administration has done a remarkable job of protecting us against a repeat of 911. The Clinton administration is to blame for 911. The blood of those 3000 people is on Clinton's hands. The threat was obviously building during the 90s. He did nothing to stop it. It was his choice not to take Osama and it was his choice to do nothing after the each terrorist attack on his watch.

 

[SuperTool]

Washington Times. Nuff said

 

[tallest1]

Originally posted by: Corn

BTW, remind me, what percentage of people not too long ago felt that Saddam was involved/responsible for 9/11?

I don't know the answer to that question Winston, why don't you provide it for us?

My educated guess would be less than 5% believed Saddam was involved/responsible for 9/11.

Wow, you're way way off. You'll find many polls that go as far back as last year showing that a a majority of Americans believed Sadaam had something to do with it.

Heres one link - to lazy to find the dozens of other polls that repeat this point: Text

But out of all the polls, I think the one that found Fox News viewers as the most misinformed subsection of TV-viewing americans was my favorite

 

[Hayabusa Rider]

Originally posted by: Corn

BTW, remind me, what percentage of people not too long ago felt that Saddam was involved/responsible for 9/11?

I don't know the answer to that question Winston, why don't you provide it for us?

My educated guess would be less than 5% believed Saddam was involved/responsible for 9/11.

Thanks Bowfinger

"The Post poll, conducted Aug. 7-11, found that 62 percent of Democrats, 80 percent of Republicans and 67 percent of independents suspected a link between Hussein and 9/11. In addition, eight in 10 Americans said it was likely that Hussein had provided assistance to al Qaeda, and a similar proportion suspected he had developed weapons of mass destruction."


There ya go Corn.

 

[CaptnKirk]

So why hasn't Bush taken claim foir the Holy War against Islam in Chad ?
Or is that another distraction. Do you still believe everything that the Bushies
tell you to believe ? Does this story interlink with the Airplane that was caught earlier in the week in an African country - the one full of mercenaries, weapons, military equipment, with the aircraft of American origination that was supposedly sold just the week before to some random bunch of Good-Doers to engage against the Evil-Doers ? Or yet another CIA game that has been playing out in the background, like Ray-Gun did with Ollie North and the Iran-Contras, where we were playing one cheating hand against the other cheating hand.
Got an easy answer do you ?
How 'bout just look the other way and hope nobody notices - if we make a big enough show somewhere else, do you think anyone will look back behind them ?
Something might be gaining.

 

[nutxo]

Originally posted by: arsbanned
Heartsurgeons logic skills hard at work again.
Black/White.

tallest1 said:

And what the heck do you think happened on 9-11? Bush had hints of a terrorist attack since at least July '01 and the guy took a vacation!

Agreed. I cannot believe Bush is willing to make 9/11 the centerpiece of his re-election bid since he in fact allowed it TO HAPPEN IN THE FIRST PLACE.
Bizarre.

So clinton caused it and bush allowed it?

Lemme grab my tinfoil and hipwaders, its getting deep.

 

[FrodoB]

History shows us that evil is defeated when Republicans are in charge. Reagan was a huge factor in the crumble of Communism and the end of the Cold War. Bush senior kicked Iraq out of Kuwait and prevented Saddam from conquering more of the Middle East (although we should have taken Saddam out then). Bush junior has destroyed much of Al Qaeda and removed Saddam. THe democrats do ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to make this world a safer place. Clinton was a stupid moron. He allowed international terrorism to grow. He was duped by North Korea. Jimmy Carter didn't accomplish anything good. He allowed radical Islam to take over Iran. There hasn't been a good democrat president since JFK.

 

[Perknose]

My educated guess would be less than 5% believed Saddam was involved/responsible for 9/11

Your educated guess?? Your educated guess just failed it's reality entrance exam. Like Bush, I guess you don't read the papers, and are proud of it.


<DIV class=intro-copy>Try 69%!!

WASHINGTON (AP) ? Nearly seven in 10 Americans believe it is likely that ousted Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein was personally involved in the Sept. 11 attacks, says a poll out almost two years after the terrorists' strike against this country. </DIV>
<P class=inside-copy>Sixty-nine percent in a <I>Washington Post</I> poll published Saturday said they believe it is likely the Iraqi leader was personally involved in the attacks carried out by al-Qaeda. A majority of Democrats, Republicans and independents believe it's likely Saddam was involved.
<P class=inside-copy>The belief in the connection persists even though there has been no proof of a link between the two.[/quote]

 

[DoubleL]

BTW, remind me, what percentage of people not too long ago felt that Saddam was involved/responsible for 9/11?

Humm could be cause Saddam met with Bin Laden and they had tapes of calls they made to each other, Could be the fuselage of the jet in Iraq that our sat. took pictures of but I know they were just meeting to talk over old times and calling each other just to say hey and I know Saddam had that fuselage just to, To, Well play like he was flying a jet I guess, Could be cause Saddem made a ass out of us for over 8 years and wouldn't let anyone see what he was doing even after giving him chance after chance and then said we would go to war if not in and to see everything and he said come on but I know he didn't have all the things he used on his people and other people and the dogs that really pissed the American people off, I could go on but I could see why something like that might make some people think Saddem was involved with 9/11

 

[Perknose]

Originally posted by: DoubleL
BTW, remind me, what percentage of people not too long ago felt that Saddam was involved/responsible for 9/11? Humm could be cause Saddam met with Bin Laden and they had tapes of calls they made to each other, Could be the fuselage of the jet in Iraq that our sat. took pictures of but I know they were just meeting to talk over old times and calling each other just to say hey and I know Saddam had that fuselage just to, To, Well play like he was flying a jet I guess, Could be cause Saddem made a ass out of us for over 8 years and wouldn't let anyone see what he was doing even after giving him chance after chance and then said we would go to war if not in and to see everything and he said come on but I know he didn't have all the things he used on his people and other people and the dogs that really pissed the American people off, I could go on but I could see why something like that might make some people think Saddem was involved with 9/11

Sooo . . . you disagree with your duly selected President?

"We have no evidence that Saddam Hussein was involved with the 11 September attacks," Mr Bush told reporters as he met members of Congress on energy legislation.