There was no agreement for sex, that's not their chosen occupation.
And yes, there is a difference. They both have the same occupation, but obviously an escort is at the top level of the occupation, whereas as streetwalker is at the bottom.
There was no agreement for sex, that's not their chosen occupation.
And yes, there is a difference. They both have the same occupation, but obviously an escort is at the top level of the occupation, whereas as streetwalker is at the bottom.
JulesMaximus
No Lifer
- Jul 3, 2003
- 74,600
- 1,005
- 126
I've gone out plenty many times with us knowing the end result...but wanted fun beforehand (you know foreplay
)
mugs
Lifer
- Apr 29, 2003
- 48,920
- 46
- 91
Morally? I dunno. Is one more likely than the other to carry an STD? I suspect the streetwalker would be - more willing to not use protection, more likely to use drugs/share needles. So from the perspective that it is morally wrong to risk infecting my SO with an STD, I'd say it would be more morally wrong to rent a $20 prostitute than a "high class" escort.
Lithium381
Lifer
- May 12, 2001
- 12,455
- 7
- 81
It's exactly the same, in the end all you're doing is fulfilling a basic need(in this case hunger, or in the original example, to get your load off) it's just how much you enjoy it between A and B, and your expectations are in scale with the price you're about to pay.
McD's: you serve yourself
4 star: you get served
McD's: C-grade beef
4 star: Grade A Angus <-please do NOT "fix" this. hehe
McD's: you get your fill for $1
4 star: you get full and then kick yourself for spending your monthly food bill in one night.
on a side note: 1000th post! :beer:
BurnItDwn
Lifer
- Oct 10, 1999
- 26,371
- 1,879
- 126
I would say yes there is a moral difference. I'm just guessing/assuming here, but here's my take on things ...
The Streetwalker is probably not clean (knowing they are sick and intentionally spreading disease is rather immoral IMO.) Also, the likelyhood that they are using the income to better themselves (as in, for a productive reason, such as pay for college) is very slim. Most likely they are just addicted to some type of drug and looking for a quick way to get a fix. As long as they just hurt themselses, I don't see it as being really immoral.
The "WILF" types are much more likely to use that income to better themselves, be it through education, or through investing. They are probably clean, or at least a much larger percentage of them are clean, they get tested regularly to be sure, and they wear protection at all times.
I don't think there is anything immoral about solicitating one of either type, though I'd say it is probably dangerous and stupid to go with the streetwalker, and expensive to go with the WILF.
The Streetwalker is probably not clean (knowing they are sick and intentionally spreading disease is rather immoral IMO.) Also, the likelyhood that they are using the income to better themselves (as in, for a productive reason, such as pay for college) is very slim. Most likely they are just addicted to some type of drug and looking for a quick way to get a fix. As long as they just hurt themselses, I don't see it as being really immoral.
The "WILF" types are much more likely to use that income to better themselves, be it through education, or through investing. They are probably clean, or at least a much larger percentage of them are clean, they get tested regularly to be sure, and they wear protection at all times.
I don't think there is anything immoral about solicitating one of either type, though I'd say it is probably dangerous and stupid to go with the streetwalker, and expensive to go with the WILF.
pssh, you're all rookies.
Obviously I'd ask rossman for a coupon first and get the $200 whore for -20 bux AC AR PM to the local streetwalker .
Is there a moral difference? Hell yeah. What kind of sick, twisted bastard pays retail for anything?
Obviously I'd ask rossman for a coupon first and get the $200 whore for -20 bux AC AR PM to the local streetwalker .
Is there a moral difference? Hell yeah. What kind of sick, twisted bastard pays retail for anything?
If the bottom line is both scenerios is sex for money.... then no, there is not moral or legal difference.
Having said that... I think the whole prostitution being illegal thing is pretty moronic.
a guy can take a girl out on a date, buy her dinner, take her home and have sex all night and it is perfectly legal. But if he gives her the same amount in cash instead of dinner, it is illegal. That makes no sense to me. If a man pays a woman to come and clean his house, wash his laundry and cook his food, he can pay her in cash and it is legal. but if he has sex with her, and give her the same hourly wage, they get arrested. silly, imho.
Personally, I think... from a legal standpoint... this should be states rights issue. Voters decide if they want a brothel in thier town or not. Strict restrictions would be put in place and all 'employees' should be tested regulary and pay taxes. And I think there should be the same restrictions as bars and casinos are far as how close to a church or school they should be.
It makes no sense to me that... if two consenting adults decide they will trade sex for money the government should get involved.
Having said that... I think the whole prostitution being illegal thing is pretty moronic.
a guy can take a girl out on a date, buy her dinner, take her home and have sex all night and it is perfectly legal. But if he gives her the same amount in cash instead of dinner, it is illegal. That makes no sense to me. If a man pays a woman to come and clean his house, wash his laundry and cook his food, he can pay her in cash and it is legal. but if he has sex with her, and give her the same hourly wage, they get arrested. silly, imho.
Personally, I think... from a legal standpoint... this should be states rights issue. Voters decide if they want a brothel in thier town or not. Strict restrictions would be put in place and all 'employees' should be tested regulary and pay taxes. And I think there should be the same restrictions as bars and casinos are far as how close to a church or school they should be.
It makes no sense to me that... if two consenting adults decide they will trade sex for money the government should get involved.
You suck at logic. The correct analogy you could have made is $20 meal vs a $200+ dinner.
Is thinking that hard?
Vic
Elite Member
- Jun 12, 2001
- 50,422
- 14,337
- 136
No. There is no moral difference. But then again, neither is doing anything morally wrong. Their bodies are their own, even to sell if they please. There is zero immorality in that, although it would not be a lifestyle that I would prefer. Now if during the course of business their clients are breaking vows and promises that they may have made to other people, that is the client's immorality, and not the prostitute's.
TRENDING THREADS
-
Discussion Zen 5 Speculation (EPYC Turin and Strix Point/Granite Ridge - Ryzen 9000)- Started by DisEnchantment
- Replies: 25K
-
Discussion Intel Meteor, Arrow, Lunar & Panther Lakes + WCL Discussion Threads
- Started by Tigerick
- Replies: 24K
-
Discussion Intel current and future Lakes & Rapids thread- Started by TheF34RChannel
- Replies: 23K
-
-
Facebook
Twitter