Poll:IS the Project for a New American Century a Global Terrorist Organization- "The NeoCons" architects of Iraq

[dahunan]

I say yes.. and would like you to defend them if you feel they are not one of the largest global terrorist organizations in history

http://www.newamericancentury.org/

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1uT7kcAu4i8

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=pnac&aq=f&oq=

 

[GodlessAstronomer]

wat?

 

[yllus]

Please, one day, come up with a coherent, well-thought-out post. Just one.

 

[IronWing]

They are not a terrorist organization because they are a bunch of white guys wearing nice suits, ipso facto, not terrorists. Next question?

 

[techs]

Hell Yes!
In fact the first result of their terrorist attacks struck last week with the first effects of their plan to destabilize the American economy.
And it terrorized the hell out of Americans.

 

[dahunan]

7 people not brave enough to tell us why Neocons aren't world terrorists??

 

[jpeyton]

100,000 dead Iraqis.

That's a bigger body count than Bin Laden and Ayers combined.

 

[ProfJohn]

Specifically what terrorist act did the people on the PNAC list carry out?

 

[RichardE]

Originally posted by: dahunan
7 people not brave enough to tell us why Neocons aren't world terrorists??

Due to the fact they have goals that are different than "spread terror" which is the definition of a terrorist. If there entire goal was to make people scared than they would be.

They have political aspiration with plans to obtain them.

Jesus people, learn he definition already. You all sound like George Bush on crack..

"terrar, terrar anyone I don't like is a teraarish, different ideology!! terar!!"

 

[Eeezee]

The Project for the New American Century intends, through issue briefs, research papers, advocacy journalism, conferences, and seminars, to explain what American world leadership entails.

Yeah, that sounds like terrorism to me :roll: I've never even heard of this group

 

[dahunan]

Originally posted by: Eeezee

The Project for the New American Century intends, through issue briefs, research papers, advocacy journalism, conferences, and seminars, to explain what American world leadership entails.

Yeah, that sounds like terrorism to me :roll: I've never even heard of this group

how do the americans get WORLD LEADERSHIP

tell us please.. do people GIVE it to them

 

[TechAZ]

This thread needs more zeitgeist and talk of masonry.

 

[dahunan]

Originally posted by: TechAZ
This thread needs more zeitgeist and talk of masonry.

Look at Iraq.. you really think the dead innocents are happy about that.. huh..

PNAC claims World Leadership via use of WAR and KILLING...

What makes it different is they use Govt to do it.. so I guess that isn't terrorism?

 

[TechAZ]

Originally posted by: dahunan

Originally posted by: TechAZ
This thread needs more zeitgeist and talk of masonry.

Look at Iraq.. you really think the dead innocents are happy about that.. huh..

PNAC claims World Leadership via use of WAR and KILLING...

What makes it different is they use Govt to do it.. so I guess that isn't terrorism?

I'll get back to you on that....I hear choppas coming and gotta get to the basement.

 

[Sinsear]

Originally posted by: TechAZ

Originally posted by: dahunan

Originally posted by: TechAZ
This thread needs more zeitgeist and talk of masonry.

Look at Iraq.. you really think the dead innocents are happy about that.. huh..

PNAC claims World Leadership via use of WAR and KILLING...

What makes it different is they use Govt to do it.. so I guess that isn't terrorism?

I'll get back to you on that....I hear choppas coming and gotta get to the basement.

:laugh:

 

[dahunan]

Originally posted by: Sinsear

Originally posted by: TechAZ

Originally posted by: dahunan

Originally posted by: TechAZ
This thread needs more zeitgeist and talk of masonry.

Look at Iraq.. you really think the dead innocents are happy about that.. huh..

PNAC claims World Leadership via use of WAR and KILLING...

What makes it different is they use Govt to do it.. so I guess that isn't terrorism?

I'll get back to you on that....I hear choppas coming and gotta get to the basement.

:laugh:

too bad it wasn't you and your parents and brothers and sisters who PNAC helped kill eh?

While we want you to be free to discuss your opinions on issues we do not take kindly to threats (even if kidding) about someone's life. Please have respect for other members and refrain from doing this further. Thank you.

PC Surgeon
AnandTech P&N Moderator

 

[Rainsford]

Ugh...I'm tired of idiots on the right misusing the word "terrorist" to describe everything they don't like, can those of you on the left PLEASE not start doing the same thing. PNAC is a shitty organization that belongs in an era of manifest destiny and the white man's burden instead of the 21st century, but they aren't "terrorists", no matter how you try to twist the term. And trying to use loaded words as a method of argument is silly, and it cheapens any actual arguments people may have against an organization like PNAC.

 

[dahunan]

^^^ This was in response to Palin calling Obama a terrorist lover

 

[palehorse]

Originally posted by: dahunan
^^^ This was in response to Palin calling Obama a terrorist lover

uhhh... what?!

Please stop skipping your meds...

 

[IronWing]

They aren't terrorists. However, those members of the PNAC who took up official office and used their offices to wage a war of aggression are war criminals.

 

[Deudalus]

How about no and the reason being solely that you are completely bat shit retarded.

 

[manowar821]

Neo-cons win by use of fear/terror. The very definition of a "terrorist". Plus they kill thousands, but killing isn't a necessity of terrorism, so they actually out-do themselves in that regard, much in the same way that our supposed enemy does.

 

[ebaycj]

Originally posted by: manowar821
Neo-cons win by use of fear/terror. The very definition of a "terrorist". Plus they kill thousands, but killing isn't a necessity of terrorism, so they actually out-do themselves in that regard, much in the same way that our supposed enemy does.

This.

I believe also that part of the OP's point was the degradation of the term "Global Terrorist Organization" from its original meaning to a new meaning that can basically function as a catch-all for anyone in America's "we don't like them" bin.

 

[Jaskalas]

Originally posted by: dahunan
7 people not brave enough to tell us why Neocons aren't world terrorists??

I stand against them, but you keep running your mouth slewing off this vitriol, barely stopping short of committing violence yourself, you mark yourself as a public enemy with how radical you are.