[POLL] If your "guy" had won the popular vote and lost because of the electoral vote,

Discussion in 'Politics and News' started by her209, Nov 8, 2012.

?

See OP

  1. Yes

  2. No

  3. Don't care

Multiple votes are allowed.
Results are only viewable after voting.
  1. her209

    her209 No Lifer

    Joined:
    Oct 11, 2000
    Messages:
    56,361
    Likes Received:
    0
    would you be in support of getting rid of the electoral vote for the popular vote?
     
  2. Newbian

    Newbian Lifer

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2008
    Messages:
    23,454
    Likes Received:
    35
    I think we went over this during the bush years. :p
     
  3. Hayabusa Rider

    Hayabusa Rider Elite Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2000
    Messages:
    39,330
    Likes Received:
    3
    I have neither candidate nor party, but I'll ask you a question I can. Do you support the EC as it stands and if your candidate wins the popular vote but loses the election would you want change? Does that also change if it's your opposition and if the answer to the latter is no, would you argue the point with equal force?
     
  4. DAGTA

    DAGTA Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 1999
    Messages:
    8,179
    Likes Received:
    0
    Regardless of who wins, I'm in support of removing the Electoral College and going with popular vote.
     
  5. Hayabusa Rider

    Hayabusa Rider Elite Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2000
    Messages:
    39,330
    Likes Received:
    3
  6. SearchMaster

    SearchMaster Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2002
    Messages:
    7,288
    Likes Received:
    8
    Absolutely not. The founders set it up for a reason. However, the states themselves have become so partisan that it wasn't a national election, it was an 11 (or fewer) state election. The other thing that's concerning is that if you look county by county, the map is overwhelmingly red, but the Democrat dominance in the large cities sways the vote in alarming ways.

    http://www-personal.umich.edu/~mejn/election/2012/countymaprb1024.png
     
  7. jagec

    jagec Lifer

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2004
    Messages:
    24,442
    Likes Received:
    0
    Their reasons don't really apply to the world of today.
     
  8. Charles Kozierok

    Charles Kozierok Elite Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2012
    Messages:
    6,762
    Likes Received:
    0
    There is no way to know when that actually happens. The closer the "sum of 51 races popular vote", the less likely it actually indicates who would have won a real PV race.

    People vote. Not cows.

    That's why we have an amendment process.
     
  9. jagec

    jagec Lifer

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2004
    Messages:
    24,442
    Likes Received:
    0
    Exactly. Get rid of the now-obsolete electoral college.

    /edit: D'oh!
     
    #10 jagec, Nov 8, 2012
    Last edited: Nov 8, 2012
  10. Charles Kozierok

    Charles Kozierok Elite Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2012
    Messages:
    6,762
    Likes Received:
    0
    Well, the problem is that many small states like having the EC. And it only takes 13 of them to block its removal.

    There's the PV interstate compact, but that seems to be stalled.
     
  11. Balt

    Balt Lifer

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2000
    Messages:
    12,109
    Likes Received:
    20
    I'm in support of getting rid of it regardless of whether it might cost my preference the election. It clearly increases voter apathy in solid red/blue states.
     
  12. Rainsford

    Rainsford Lifer

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2001
    Messages:
    17,521
    Likes Received:
    0
    I don't think so, no. The electoral college has some decent arguments against it, but people winning the popular vote and losing the electoral college isn't one of them as far as I'm concerned. The biggest issue is more to do with how it focuses the election on an incredibly small percentage of Americans while ignoring millions of Americans in non-competitive states like California and Texas. It doesn't even do what it claims to do when protecting the small states since non-competitive small states are even more ignored than large ones.
     
  13. Rainsford

    Rainsford Lifer

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2001
    Messages:
    17,521
    Likes Received:
    0
    How is that at all concerning or alarming unless you don't understand population density?
     
  14. SKORPI0

    SKORPI0 Lifer

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2000
    Messages:
    13,869
    Likes Received:
    15
  15. JEDIYoda

    JEDIYoda Lifer

    Joined:
    Jul 13, 2005
    Messages:
    23,977
    Likes Received:
    18
    A bunch of crybabies..just suck it up....Romney lost that`s all there is to it!!
     
  16. Jaskalas

    Jaskalas Lifer

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2004
    Messages:
    22,368
    Likes Received:
    63
    I've been wondering about the electoral vote.

    At first I had presumed it was in place to balance out state representation the way the Senate does. But of course the big states like CA, TX, and NY all have HUGE portions tied to their population. So the EC is a representation of the popular vote and blows my previous assumption out of the water.

    So it's really just a per-state winner take all. Which creates some really stupid campaigning...

    I need to be convinced what its purpose is again. I've lost sight of what it's good for.
     
  17. SparkyJJO

    SparkyJJO Lifer

    Joined:
    May 16, 2002
    Messages:
    13,358
    Likes Received:
    3
    The southern-most part of texas is a little suspicious looking to me :hmm:

    But to the OP - no. It serves a purpose. It may need some adjustments because I wonder how accurate it still is at times, but getting rid of the electoral college isn't the answer.
     
  18. Farang

    Farang Lifer

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2003
    Messages:
    10,922
    Likes Received:
    1
    I might support proportional electoral allocation, I'd have to see arguments for/against. Although a national popular vote makes sense, with our 50/50 electorate it would eventually create a nightmare recount. The legal battles that would ensue, there is no way they'd be resolved before inauguration.
     
  19. Jaskalas

    Jaskalas Lifer

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2004
    Messages:
    22,368
    Likes Received:
    63
    Can you explain what that purpose is?
     
  20. SearchMaster

    SearchMaster Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2002
    Messages:
    7,288
    Likes Received:
    8
    So that the campaign process didn't consist of pandering to CA, TX, NY, and FL?
     
  21. Hayabusa Rider

    Hayabusa Rider Elite Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2000
    Messages:
    39,330
    Likes Received:
    3
    As set up there is no winner take all, but neither was it prohibited. Over time parties tend to dominate in many states. The paramount function of any power based organization is to obtain and keep control. Consequently, it is in the best interest of a controlling party to have a winner take all system, not a true reflection of the vote of it's citizens. Note my state, NY. It's always blue, but thats not true of its people. This is where we go out of our way to suppress diversity. In any winner take all states, those who select a candidate who loses by even one vote are effectively disenfranchised at the national level and the winning party eliminates the contribution of those who didn't want it. A solution would be elimination of winner take all, based on the fact that it violates equal protection by eliminating ones vote at the national level. I'm not sure how to properly formulate this in legal language, but it's arguably true.
     
  22. Agent11

    Agent11 Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2006
    Messages:
    3,535
    Likes Received:
    1
    It may not be perfect but the system we have now is just as good as any alternatives and has the benefit of being familiar.
     
  23. randomrogue

    randomrogue Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2011
    Messages:
    5,462
    Likes Received:
    0
    The EC makes sense. If it doesn't you just need to read up on it a bit more.

    If that doesn't work then look at the extremes for both a popular vote election and an EC election. They're both pretty terrible if you look at it from the extremes but the EC is better.
     
  24. pcgeek11

    pcgeek11 Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2005
    Messages:
    8,776
    Likes Received:
    25
    The EC need to be gone, regardless of who won it should be by popular vote.