Mo0o
Lifer
- Jul 31, 2001
- 24,227
- 3
- 76
Actually that's completely wrong. the first forms of life were naked self-replicating RNA molecules. If you want to go further back, very very simple selfreplicating molecules. And nucleic acids HAVE been formed from simple organic molecules in experimentsOriginally posted by: RapidSnail
Originally posted by: Mo0o
I read the first 5 paragraphs and I already know the gist of their poorly thought out argument. First of all, complex life as we know it today did not magically appear 3.5 billion years ago. So in terms of the flash cards analogy, natural didn't suddenly align the 10 cards in a row. Evolution stats that you start very simple then build to complexity through a string of changes that work. So you start with 1. Ok , that's fine. Then as one multiplies, you add a number (a mutation). If its a 3, then obviously 1,3 is out of order an that set "dies" (reflecting a less competitve mutation doomd to extinction) but while this 1,3 set is going extinct, another 1 just had a 2 card added next to it. Since thats in order ,it stays. So if you propagate that idea, you can build to 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10 without having all of them be there at once. Who ever wrote that article has a very poor understanding of evolutionary theory.Originally posted by: RapidSnail
Originally posted by: Mo0o
Why is probability an inherent problem for evolution?Originally posted by: RapidSnail
Originally posted by: DougK62
Originally posted by: bluemax
For all those calling the Bible "fairy tales" I have only one thing to say regarding evolution and the beginning of all life;
"It rained on the rocks."
Now THAT'S fairy-tale magic!
I can't tolerate bad data, and the poor excuse of a theory "evolution" is shot full of holes, reckless theory, NO evidence or falsified evidence.
Makes me wonder what they're so desperate to prove that they have to make up BS to "prove" it?
...and I do SO love the bible-bashers who haven't got a clue what's even inside it.
(And those that have the slightest inkling have still barely scratched the surface.)
I'm a man of science. Truth is based on facts. History, science, evidence. Facts.
Creation has this, evolution does not. End of Line.
Uhh...seriously? Last I checked, the theory of evolution is packed full of veifiable facts and is one of the most "solid" theories in all of science. I guess you're just smarter than the entire scientific community...
Seriously. Just look at the inherent problems with evolution such as the fossil record, entropy, and probability.
Here is something basic to start off.
According to evolution, single-celled organisms where the first forms of life. Do you have any idea how amazingly complex even those tiny creatures are (thousands of genes)? The article was for the purpose of demonstrating the impossibility that even the "simplest" forms of life could not have come together from a collection of random processes and that it is clearly a showcase of the ordered structure of the universe.
