• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

POLL: Fullscreen or Widescreen DVD's?

Page 2 - Seeking answers? Join the AnandTech community: where nearly half-a-million members share solutions and discuss the latest tech.
Well it's heartening to see the poll results.

But as some have already mentioned... the real answer to this poll is OAR, which stands for original aspect ratio. Personally I don't want to see a move originally filmed in 4:3 exhibited in 1.85:1--reason being it would require chopping off the top and/or bottom. Same reason I don't want to watch something filmed in 1.85:1 (or god forbid 2.35:1) exhibited in a 4:3 window--doing so requires chopping off picture information from the side(s) of the picture. And chopping a movie up is like blashphemy. Liken it to cutting off the top and botom of the Mona Lisa just so you can fit it in that square frame you've got laying around. Just say no.

So even though I voted widescreen, the key here is OAR.

l2c
 
Originally posted by: Viper GTS
Originally posted by: kgraeme
Originally posted by: Chaotic42
You mean there are movies that aren't widescreen?

Mommy, make the bad man stop with the lies!!!!

Yes, actually. For instance, Stanley Kubrick wanted his movies shown 4:3. Plus there's always the TV series that go to DVD like X-Files, Simpsons, anime, etc.

TV series are OK, that's what I said OAR - Not everything is filmed in widescreen, & that's OK.

But if it was filmed in anything but 4:3 they damn well better not chop it.

Yep, I was just pointing out examples. But what do you feel about movies where it was filmed 4:3, originally presented in the theaters widescreen, but the director prefers the 4:3?
 
Originally posted by: yakko
I prefer the original aspect ratio.

It would be nice to have an option for both widescreen and full-frame on the same DVD (they used to do this, I wonder why they stopped?), for watching on a computer monitor or small TV. Though larger TV = OAR always.
 
I like kubrik's philosophy... film it in 4:3 and crop it on the top and bottom for the cinema, then preserve the original 4:3 for home video / dvd.
 
stop the senseless butchering! pan&scan must die! educate the masses! tell them pan&scan is the work of the dev-ill !!! ;-)

OAR....accept no substitutes.



-hudster
 
Originally posted by: zimmie6576
Originally posted by: yakko
I prefer the original aspect ratio.

It would be nice to have an option for both widescreen and full-frame on the same DVD (they used to do this, I wonder why they stopped?), for watching on a computer monitor or small TV. Though larger TV = OAR always.

The still do sell "some" dvds with both aspects, usually wide on one side and fullscreen on the other.

I enjoy widescreen though cause there's just so much more to see.
 
Originally posted by: zimmie6576
Originally posted by: yakko
I prefer the original aspect ratio.

It would be nice to have an option for both widescreen and full-frame on the same DVD (they used to do this, I wonder why they stopped?), for watching on a computer monitor or small TV. Though larger TV = OAR always.

They are dropping it because of all the crap extras they put on there and charge more for. I just want the movie in OAR dammit.
 
OAR

it's not about more or less picture, it's about the correct picture

anyone who thinks fullscreen is better under any circumstances should have a look at this
 
Back
Top