Poll: Do you agree with Nader's opinion of current 2 party system?

[Pliablemoose]

 

[b0mbrman]

How does your poll relate to your thread title?

 

[Pliablemoose]

Nader said that he felt both parties were very similar, and the end result was the same, the voters being sold by our politicians whoever is elected.

Sorry, it wasn't very clear, and I can't edit that part of the poll

 

[Tripleshot]

If Nader had any credibility at all, he would have stuck to his green party of 2000. He is a johnny come lately entering well after the process has started, capitilizing on vulnerabilites without giving anything in return. You must check his motivation, which right now seems to be still the green party...........the green in his jeans.:disgust:

He doesn't have a prayer of winning, so why run? A spoiler? WTF? What does he have to prove? Who is he trying to impress? Who is funding this toad?

Pat Buchanen was a better candidiate in 2000 and had a compelling message. Nader is a turd. He has no message at all. Al Sharpton would be a better choice. so would Maxine Waters. Any chump in this forum who touts nader as a viable choice has no place in the debate other than to troll.

He is not going to change the landscape of this election one iota. It is going to be Kerry by a landside with Edwards agreeing to be VP on the ticket. It's cast in stone. Bush is toast with that combination.

Hell, Bush is toast with any combination.

 

[Nietzscheusw]

Nader has a higher IQ than Bush and is more honest than Kerry.
Two reasons to vote for him for any rational person.

 

[ReiAyanami]

yeah, Shrub is a moron and Kerry looks like skeletor. as long as Nader isn't on atkins i'd vote for him.

 

[heartsurgeon]

Who is funding this toad?

I'm gonna sent him $200.00
I hope the RNC sends him 5-10 million, money well spent in my opinion.

 

[nutxo]

Originally posted by: Nietzscheusw
Nader has a higher IQ than Bush and is more honest than Kerry.
Two reasons to vote for him for any rational person.

Don't forget the eye.

3 reasons!

 

[Cerb]

Both major parties are bad, sold and have only a handful of members who actually care about what they should be there for. Many people have conspiracy theories. Personally, I don't need to believe the Freemasons are running everything--I have a firm belief in mass human stupidity.

 

[b0mbrman]

Originally posted by: heartsurgeon

Who is funding this toad?

I'm gonna sent him $200.00
I hope the RNC sends him 5-10 million, money well spent in my opinion.

 

[kylebisme]

overwheming majory here saying yes. now the question is; what can we do about it?

 

[0roo0roo]

Originally posted by: Nietzscheusw
Nader has a higher IQ than Bush and is more honest than Kerry.
Two reasons to vote for him for any rational person.

if you can call delusion honesty, then sure, he's honest.

 

[Mill]

Yeah, Nader is pretty dead on. I wouldn't say they are entirely similar, but there is really nary a difference between the two. They just disagree with each other on certain issues to give the illusion of choice. I actually might be best that way. Anyway, I certainly think that Nader is running as spoiler and appeals to the lunatic fringe of the Dem party, but this is good for America as a whole. Perot almost pulled off some nice stuff in the 90's. A Two party system sucks ass and we need more parties. I've yet to see why anyone would vote for fvcking John Kerry or reelect Bush. What is with this BS lessor of two evils chit? Someone needs to run that will WIN because they are GOOD and have a nice stance on issues.

 

[Mill]

Originally posted by: Nietzscheusw
Nader has a higher IQ than Bush and is more honest than Kerry.
Two reasons to vote for him for any rational person.

Do you have any proof to either statement, or are you trolling as usual? IQ is highly overrated anyway.... and so is honesty. Moron.

 

[kylebisme]

lol Mill, no reason to get all rilled up. from your last post it seems like you share the same basic sentiment and simply you have your own way of expressing it.

also i want to point out that while i agree that more parties would be a good thing, voting Nader isn't going to do anything for that as he is running as an independent.

 

[Nietzscheusw]

Originally posted by: Mill

Originally posted by: Nietzscheusw
Nader has a higher IQ than Bush and is more honest than Kerry.
Two reasons to vote for him for any rational person.

Do you have any proof to either statement, or are you trolling as usual? IQ is highly overrated anyway.... and so is honesty. Moron.

Well, I tried to keep it simple for the simpletons voting republican or democratic forever because they identify themselves with either party.

 

[arsbanned]

Proof? Listen to even one Bush statement or speech. There's your proof. Boom.

 

[chess9]

Nietszchesw:

Uh, high IQ is an automatic DISQUALIFIER in Presidents.

I don't know what Nader's "real" motivation is but the more the merrier.

And look at this race as it is now shaping up. We have Kerry The Suit vs. Bush the Barbarian. Neither one can say anything cogent without sounding like they own the universe or can't spell universe. I wouldn't even suggest potatoe, er potato, er, potatooos, er....

-Robert

 

[Nietzscheusw]

Poohtato!

 

[XZeroII]

Originally posted by: arsbanned
Proof? Listen to even one Bush statement or speech. There's your proof. Boom.

Just because Tesla couldn't speak in public doesn't mean that he wasn't smart. Bad public speaker != low IQ.

 

[Mill]

Originally posted by: Nietzscheusw

Originally posted by: Mill

Originally posted by: Nietzscheusw
Nader has a higher IQ than Bush and is more honest than Kerry.
Two reasons to vote for him for any rational person.

Do you have any proof to either statement, or are you trolling as usual? IQ is highly overrated anyway.... and so is honesty. Moron.

Well, I tried to keep it simple for the simpletons voting republican or democratic forever because they identify themselves with either party.

I don't really identity myself with either party. I'm a quasi-Republican, but I'm open to 3rd parties. So, do you have a point?

 

[Nietzscheusw]

Originally posted by: Mill

Originally posted by: Nietzscheusw

Originally posted by: Mill

Originally posted by: Nietzscheusw
Nader has a higher IQ than Bush and is more honest than Kerry.
Two reasons to vote for him for any rational person.

Do you have any proof to either statement, or are you trolling as usual? IQ is highly overrated anyway.... and so is honesty. Moron.

Well, I tried to keep it simple for the simpletons voting republican or democratic forever because they identify themselves with either party.

I don't really identity myself with either party. I'm a quasi-Republican, but I'm open to 3rd parties. So, do you have a point?

Yes! I am having a pint! Cheers! :beer:

 

[Nitemare]

I had 0 respect for Nader until I heard that statement...now I have a little

 

[Bitek]

Originally posted by: heartsurgeon

Who is funding this toad?

I'm gonna sent him $200.00
I hope the RNC sends him 5-10 million, money well spent in my opinion.

Are you sure that's all you can afford? Bush is going to need a lot more than that if he wants to have a real shot. After all he's given back to you, can you find it in your heart to dig a little deeper?

 

[chess9]

After giving it a second thought, I don't think Nader will be much of an influence in the upcoming election.

a. He's too old (70).
b. He has no serious organization.
c. He has very little money.
d. A lot of liberal democrats have learned their lesson. Better a President with half a brain, than one who is brain DEAD.

Republicans would be much better off finding and funding a real conservative candidate than contributing to Nader. One without helium between the ears would be helpful.

Let the games begin.

-Robert