MtnMan
Diamond Member
- Jul 27, 2004
- 9,429
- 8,832
- 136
That is still better. Instead of being in a bar with 50 - 75 - 100 people most of which you don't know, there will be less spread if 6 - 10 people gather at somebody's home. That the goal when cities and states set a limit on the number of people that can congregate.It comes down to your personal responsibility to your fellow man. Do I think it's smart / unsmart? Doesn't seem like much of an option. It's a governing bodies way of trying to curtail a pandemic with citizens who DGAF. Not all citizens, but enough to make a formidable negative impact on efforts of citizens who do GAF. I think it's just another band aid on the problem of human stupidity.
The people impacted by this order will just hangout at someone's house instead.
Plus you know these people, vs. total
