Yes....So sadly pathetic. A simplified presentation of corroborated events of history and facts dismissed by an illiterate who's so terrified of corrections against what he feels must be and against being found in error, that he must dismiss outright, a meaningless 'wall of text...' I mean, how dare one summarise events with sentences...
My previous post outlining from multiple prime sources of how no legal authorisation for war existed against Iraq, in 2003. The truth is freaky to neocon schmucks.
Here lies glenn1, an intellectually numbing example of citizenry enabling politically lead disaster and crime:With substance, I certainly did dismiss all that you wrote in defence of the criminal Iraq war.
So glenn1, let's take this further to demonstrate your ineptness in comprehension and display to tis forum, again, how wrong you are.
The
Iraq Liberation Act? You are such a neocon tool to mischaracterise it for warfare, yet it was some simple legislative platitude limited against:
SEC. 8. RULE OF CONSTRUCTION.
Nothing in this Act shall be construed to authorize or otherwise
speak to the use of United States Armed Forces (except as provided in section 4(a)(2)) in carrying out this Act. SEC. 4 2) Military <<NOTE: President.>> assistance.--(A) The
President is authorized to direct the drawdown of defense
articles from the stocks of the Department of Defense, defense services of the Department of Defense, and military education and training for such organizations.
glenn1 is either a lying neocon tool or an incompetent twit, who well over a decade later continues on with bullshit falsehoods that such a US domestic law -- particularly his chosen legislation that specifically denied the authorisation of US military forces -- permitted a military invasion of Iraq.
That's just US domestic law, let alone my previous outlining of just how wrong glenn1 was with his repetition of the other common neocon lie concerning the United Nations Security Council having already presented continued authorisation for military action against the sovereign state of Iraq.
glenn1, you lost on yet another point.
You aren't even aware of weak summaries against existing stockpiles of chemical weapons were present in Iraq. Here's a hint, glenny, you're bloody occupational forces, after a decade in Iraq found nada to save face for your state's and the UK's (...oh must neither forget the
massive coalition of forces including the Danes and Poland......) WMD lie.
If such a castigating report against breach of terms by Iraq was present, then there would have been little concern by your worships Bush, Cheney, and Blair to have the UN Security Council sit to reassess. As my previous post damned them, they couldn't, as they knew to have nothing credible, and therefore didn't. Rather than approach the Security Council, the sent token Powell to make a lying propaganda ass of himself in front of the General Assembly. That hurt the USA's international credibility even further. Yet too many dumb Yanks sucked it up. War was known in the UK and USA governments to be unjustified and illegal, but war was early set for an unstoppable go. The reality against Iraq's possession of offensive WMDs was known by much of the world governments then and proved later to be, that Yankee land and the Brits were full of shit, and later stained their faces in dung when incapable of finding a grain to parade on TV. glenn1, you partisan head is so far up the neocon's asses, that you're actually still rehashing their failed arguments for war then, as a current justification now for those 2003 high international crimes of aggression.
I comprehend the topic and am certainly open minded enough to discuss every point that you raised, and with concisely accurate comprehension, citing from the prime sources to support the stated truth while contradicting your falsehoods.
No glenn1, such a personal critique has no basis against me. Understanding little if any of the topic, dismissing in failure, and arguing with
BS, that's all you.
Thanks for playing and displaying all that's wrong with a criminally inclined segment of this world.
Sorry, this post was bit crude, yet out of belittling frustration against the continued incompetent presence of the partisan neocons defending likes as glenn1. Hell, I even read of Cheney taking a thrashing by FOXNews........ Glenny boy, you're sorely out of touch.
Facebook
Twitter