- Nov 9, 1999
- 1,774
- 12
- 81
Since all of the election hype and partisan drivel has hit this board, I've been thinking about some of the differences between the two major political affiliations. One of the things that struck me as odd is the fact that "liberal democrats" are supposedly big champions of free speech, but also appear to be the big proponent of political correctness. Now, all of this political correctness appears to me to be self-censorship and censorship of others through "peer pressure", for lack of a better term. In other words, society is accepting these alternative phrases and, in a sense, forcing others to use them as well by creating a fear in the person of being labeled a bigot, homophobe, etc. As one of many examples, using the term "African-American" instead of black. Black people are no more African than I (an American-born, white skinned descendant of multiple different nationalities) am. I would also venture to guess that most of these "African-Americans" have never even BEEN to Africa. Besides, what is so derogatory about the word "black"? It is a color, just like white, yellow, red, or whatever other color you care to name. If someone calls me a white person, I'm not going to go getting all worked up and pissed off. Same goes for all of the other PC terms that are used.
Anyone care to explain the reasoning behind the PC movement and how someone could claim to support free speech while advocating PC at that same time?
Anyone care to explain the reasoning behind the PC movement and how someone could claim to support free speech while advocating PC at that same time?
