Originally posted by: halik
How much money are you willing to pay for iraqi democracy? How many lives?
Originally posted by: halik
How much money are you willing to pay for iraqi democracy? How many lives?
Originally posted by: RichardE
Originally posted by: halik
How much money are you willing to pay for iraqi democracy? How many lives?
Political change is rarely bloodless.
As in revolutionary, people always try to cling to power.
The US might have lost 2500 lives, how many Iraqis will die if the US pulls out now?
Originally posted by: halik
Originally posted by: RichardE
Originally posted by: halik
How much money are you willing to pay for iraqi democracy? How many lives?
Political change is rarely bloodless.
As in revolutionary, people always try to cling to power.
The US might have lost 2500 lives, how many Iraqis will die if the US pulls out now?
Political change comes from within, when the people are motivated and willing to make the scrifice. If they're not , no amount of US dollars and dead marines will be enough.
<- lived thru one revolution
Originally posted by: RichardE
Originally posted by: halik
Originally posted by: RichardE
Originally posted by: halik
How much money are you willing to pay for iraqi democracy? How many lives?
Political change is rarely bloodless.
As in revolutionary, people always try to cling to power.
The US might have lost 2500 lives, how many Iraqis will die if the US pulls out now?
Political change comes from within, when the people are motivated and willing to make the scrifice. If they're not , no amount of US dollars and dead marines will be enough.
<- lived thru one revolution
How many of the people of the countries 28mil+inhabitants are killing and fighting? How many are just trying to make a life for there kids. Painting them all with the same brush is the same as saying all Americans are copies of Bush/CEO's/Greedy Capitalist and all are intent on doing nothing but spreading US power no matter what, which as we know isn't the truth.
Originally posted by: halik
Originally posted by: RichardE
Originally posted by: halik
Originally posted by: RichardE
Originally posted by: halik
How much money are you willing to pay for iraqi democracy? How many lives?
Political change is rarely bloodless.
As in revolutionary, people always try to cling to power.
The US might have lost 2500 lives, how many Iraqis will die if the US pulls out now?
Political change comes from within, when the people are motivated and willing to make the scrifice. If they're not , no amount of US dollars and dead marines will be enough.
<- lived thru one revolution
How many of the people of the countries 28mil+inhabitants are killing and fighting? How many are just trying to make a life for there kids. Painting them all with the same brush is the same as saying all Americans are copies of Bush/CEO's/Greedy Capitalist and all are intent on doing nothing but spreading US power no matter what, which as we know isn't the truth.
Well in that case, we should be able to leave them alone, because the want the democracy and will make the sacrifice...right? Didn't you just argue that we can't pull out? Which one is it?
Originally posted by: RichardE
Originally posted by: halik
Originally posted by: RichardE
Originally posted by: halik
Originally posted by: RichardE
Originally posted by: halik
How much money are you willing to pay for iraqi democracy? How many lives?
Political change is rarely bloodless.
As in revolutionary, people always try to cling to power.
The US might have lost 2500 lives, how many Iraqis will die if the US pulls out now?
Political change comes from within, when the people are motivated and willing to make the scrifice. If they're not , no amount of US dollars and dead marines will be enough.
<- lived thru one revolution
How many of the people of the countries 28mil+inhabitants are killing and fighting? How many are just trying to make a life for there kids. Painting them all with the same brush is the same as saying all Americans are copies of Bush/CEO's/Greedy Capitalist and all are intent on doing nothing but spreading US power no matter what, which as we know isn't the truth.
Well in that case, we should be able to leave them alone, because the want the democracy and will make the sacrifice...right? Didn't you just argue that we can't pull out? Which one is it?
Both, and there you are stuck in the mentality of the people in the cartoon. If it does not happen overnight it will not happen.
So we should leave because the 28million plus do not have the weapons and training to fight the militia/insurgents that are actively killing them? Or do we stay and protect the 28million so that they can see the benefits of democracy, though slowly?
QFTOriginally posted by: halik
Originally posted by: RichardE
Originally posted by: halik
Originally posted by: RichardE
Originally posted by: halik
Originally posted by: RichardE
Originally posted by: halik
How much money are you willing to pay for iraqi democracy? How many lives?
Political change is rarely bloodless.
As in revolutionary, people always try to cling to power.
The US might have lost 2500 lives, how many Iraqis will die if the US pulls out now?
Political change comes from within, when the people are motivated and willing to make the scrifice. If they're not , no amount of US dollars and dead marines will be enough.
<- lived thru one revolution
How many of the people of the countries 28mil+inhabitants are killing and fighting? How many are just trying to make a life for there kids. Painting them all with the same brush is the same as saying all Americans are copies of Bush/CEO's/Greedy Capitalist and all are intent on doing nothing but spreading US power no matter what, which as we know isn't the truth.
Well in that case, we should be able to leave them alone, because the want the democracy and will make the sacrifice...right? Didn't you just argue that we can't pull out? Which one is it?
Both, and there you are stuck in the mentality of the people in the cartoon. If it does not happen overnight it will not happen.
So we should leave because the 28million plus do not have the weapons and training to fight the militia/insurgents that are actively killing them? Or do we stay and protect the 28million so that they can see the benefits of democracy, though slowly?
You're missing the point - revolution always comes from people with no weapons and no training. There is never anything sincere about a revolution conducted with armed forces. That's how individuals usurp power. .
.
I've seen college kids get beaten (even to death), hosed with a firetruck, arrested and shot all in a protest for their self evident liberties. And every day they would be back, knowing the same will happen. And then other people joined them, professionals, parents, teachers and then more and more. People finally saw the chance of freedom and were willing to make the sacrifice. That's something you won't get in iraq or in any imposed "democracy" - there are no empowered people, no cause that unites them. All you've succeeded in doing is empowering a bunch of power hungry individuals and created sectarian antipathy.
Originally posted by: RichardE
Text
I think this properly expresses how people see Iraq, expecting it to be fixed overnight. We can all agree it was wrong to go in, but now that we are there, people should understand that there is a job to do.
Originally posted by: lozina
Originally posted by: RichardE
Text
I think this properly expresses how people see Iraq, expecting it to be fixed overnight. We can all agree it was wrong to go in, but now that we are there, people should understand that there is a job to do.
Here you go, FIXED!
Those 28 million people do not want us to protect them. They do not want to be occupied. We have not seen any progress since immediately after the fall of Saddam's military. Why do you think that the U.S will defeat the insurgencies with in the next 75 years?Originally posted by: RichardE
Both, and there you are stuck in the mentality of the people in the cartoon. If it does not happen overnight it will not happen.
So we should leave because the 28million plus do not have the weapons and training to fight the militia/insurgents that are actively killing them? Or do we stay and protect the 28million so that they can see the benefits of democracy, though slowly?
Originally posted by: lozina
Originally posted by: RichardE
Text
I think this properly expresses how people see Iraq, expecting it to be fixed overnight. We can all agree it was wrong to go in, but now that we are there, people should understand that there is a job to do.
Here you go, FIXED!
LunarRay
07/19/2003 11:12 PM
It just occured to me that Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Wolfie, Rice and friends will many years hence be referred to as the "Founding Fathers" of Iraq... now ain't that some parentage...
Agreed. The job is to bury the mindless idiots that started this war of lies and find a more competent groupt to at least try to lead us out of the hole the Bushwhackos dug for us. :|Originally posted by: RichardE
... but now that we are there, people should understand that there is a job to do.
Originally posted by: themusgrat
It is not just about freeing the Iraqis, it is about the bigger picture. As the most powerful nation on the earth, we have the responsibility to help others out. You need to look past today and see tomorrow. The world will be a better place with Iraq being a free nation. In any case, we cannot pull out now, so get out of your ivory tower and see the world for what it is, and don't tell me that Iraq doesn't matter. And those people do not want us there because we made numerous tactical errors. Blowing up everything in sight was our mindset, and now that we have effecitvely destroyed their infrastructure, they don't like it. But they do like freedom, which is one major reason that we are there. If we can show them that we are there for their good, not just ours, we can win them over. But I agree that that will be hard to do now, so we need to get out as soon as possible, and stop trying to put our people in power. That is another main problem, we want people in power there that love us, and that will do whatever we say. But simply put, that is not the best thing for Iraq, and they need someone who will put Iraq ahead of the US, or any other nation. If we were to stop messing with their politics, that would go a long way.
Originally posted by: bdude
the only problem is he's planted a metal screw