Ns1
No Lifer
- Jun 17, 2001
- 55,418
- 1,598
- 126
A blunt shouldn't cost $20-60 (right?). Somebody ain't telling the truth.
1 gram blunts cost ~$20 - most people do not buy 1 gram blunts. $60 would probably be an 8th.
A blunt shouldn't cost $20-60 (right?). Somebody ain't telling the truth.
1 gram blunts cost ~$20 - most people do not buy 1 gram blunts. $60 would probably be an 8th.
Damn. By my calc that works out $560 an oz.
Fern
Yes they are!
Home invasions have to end. All they had to do was sit back, announce themselves, and wait for the guy to surrender. OR sit back and wait for him to leave his house to go do something.
A little patience and police wouldn't be killing innocent people all across this country. They are directly to blame!
Procedures and rules of engagement need to change. It should NOT be standard policy to bust in doors in the middle of the night. This country needs to riot until this policy changes.
2 dollars worth?
Is that like a mouth full of smoke?
I'm so glad colorado made pot legal.
Amen. It's proving to be superior public policy that should be implemented everywhere in this country. It's a declaration of Peace, on ourselves, one that we can all easily live with.
I pity those who are able to rationalize these kinds of debacles in the name of an illusory "greater good."
Towns have been banning dispensaries though right? So they are still battling all over the state. I've heard there has been a huge increase in illegal grow arrests since the program started, is that true?
this part angers me the most
Meh. IDK. It says the cops knocked on his door and announced themselves. It was at 7:30 PM, no reason to think they were asleep at that hour.
Needs more facts. The boyfriend says they only sold a blunt here and there to friends. The article says the police drove the informant there to buy $20-60 of pot. Did the cop driving the informant there confiscate the pot? One would think so. A blunt shouldn't cost $20-60 (right?). Somebody ain't telling the truth.
The informant should have been the one shot.
Fern
So he is credible enough to get a no knock warrant on some stoner kids that requires the friggen SWAT team leading to the death of some poor kid who was basically out of weed but not credible enough to say that the cops twisted his words?
Does that sum it up about right?
So he is credible enough to get a no knock warrant on some stoner kids that requires the friggen SWAT team leading to the death of some poor kid who was basically out of weed but not credible enough to say that the cops twisted his words?
Does that sum it up about right?
So he is credible enough to get a no knock warrant on some stoner kids that requires the friggen SWAT team leading to the death of some poor kid who was basically out of weed but not credible enough to say that the cops twisted his words?
Does that sum it up about right?
What does that have to do with the swat team's orders? They were called in and given a no-knock warrant. So they did exactly what they were told to do and the guy, unfortunately, was armed. The problem in this case isn't with the swat team. Its with the idiots commanding them. You said it yourself, the procedures and rules of engagement need to change. The swat team doesn't make the rules.
They followed proper procedure as ordered, the lead investigator used them on bullshit info and it got a seemingly decent man killed.
He said/ she said pretty much sums it up. Both parties will embellish any story to serve their purposes.
Results matter, and we'll keep getting poor ones from poor policy.
None of it has to make sense, anyway, because it's Florida.
Not send two shotgun slugs through an exterior wall to potentially kill an innocent bystander or neighbor over some kids?
I'd put the blame on the cops as much as anyone but, in this case, the victim had it coming. I mean, this guy isn't too bright. He knew he was doing something that was illegal in that state and still went and talked to police? Why? You never talk to police. They may know more than you think and, in this case, it caused him his life. You have a snitch singing in that cops' ears and you have the victim going to police and telling them that he has a gun in his home and is concerned for his own safety. When it came time to serve that warrant, do you really think police were going to take any chance with a jumpy drug dealer? He signed his death warrant when he talked to that cop.
it's right here if you'd like to read it.Police tracked down the suspect and warned him to stay away. Westcott, those close to him said, was left with a word of advice from the investigating officers: If anyone breaks into this house, grab your gun and shoot to kill.
On the night of May 27, as armed men streamed through his front door, Westcott grabbed his gun. But the 29-year-old didn't have a chance to shoot before he died in a volley of gunfire. And those who killed him weren't robbers.
In an interview with the Times, Tampa police Chief Jane Castor defended the drug investigation at 906 W Knollwood and said she has seen no signs that the officers who killed Westcott acted inappropriately.
"Mr. Westcott lost his life because he aimed a loaded firearm at police officers. You can take the entire marijuana issue out of the picture," Castor said. "If there's an indication that there is armed trafficking going on — someone selling narcotics while they are armed or have the ability to use a firearm — then the tactical response team will do the initial entry."
To be fair its roughly the same in every other state. It's not like incidents like incidents like this only happen in Florida...
do your arms hurt?
cause that kind of reaching must really take a toll on them.
remember the opart when the cops told him to shoot anyone that walks in the door?
or was it TL;DR
it's right here if you'd like to read it.
you: but wait that's not what im talking about
me: it is like you stopped reading after the title.
he pulled a gun in self defense.
exactly what the police told him to do.
