Police falsely told a man he couldn’t film them. ‘I’m an attorney,’ he said - Wilmington NC

Jimzz

Diamond Member
Oct 23, 2012
4,399
190
106
Police falsely told a man he couldn’t film them. ‘I’m an attorney,’ he said. ‘I know what the law is.’
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news...-its-against-the-law-to-record-police-its-not

How can cops keep doing the same mess over and over... oh yea because they never get punished for it. And the even stupider thing about this, he only went public because they were so hard headed they would not return the guys calls and offer a simple apology. All they had to do was say sorry and it would have never gone public. Now its national news.


EDIT/Update:

Officer demoted after telling man he couldn't record police

http://www.bigstory.ap.org/article/...ed-after-telling-man-he-couldnt-record-police

 
Last edited:

highland145

Lifer
Oct 12, 2009
43,973
6,337
136
Bright said he didn’t initially want to share his story to the media, but when Becker refused to return his phone calls and the department never apologized, he decided to go public.

Yeah, eff them. Idiots. And...

“I think the video shows that the police are willing to lie in order to coerce people into doing what they want them to do,” he said. “You just have to know your rights.”


I don't care if you're 16 or 60....LAWYER.

That said, I do not think most police are out to get "you." Their job sucks balls and they're underpaid.
 

Rubycon

Madame President
Aug 10, 2005
17,768
485
126
I've had a lot of phones that have video capability.
None of them expose film or use magnetic tape in the process.
I'm old I know, but I must have missed something here. ;)
 

Darwin333

Lifer
Dec 11, 2006
19,946
2,329
126
Well a defense attorney that needs to make extra money driving for Uber isn't someone I'd want to hire but I'd think that he would be motivated to just do the right thing and release it regardless of an apology. WTF does an apology to him do for all the other people they did similar shit to? And yes, I'd still hire the guy who, if it is true, purposely set his pants on fire to try and get his client off an arson charge. Anyone willing to burn their frank and beans to keep me out of jail is a guy I want working on my side.
 

Jimzz

Diamond Member
Oct 23, 2012
4,399
190
106
Well a defense attorney that needs to make extra money driving for Uber isn't someone I'd want to hire but I'd think that he would be motivated to just do the right thing and release it regardless of an apology. WTF does an apology to him do for all the other people they did similar shit to? And yes, I'd still hire the guy who, if it is true, purposely set his pants on fire to try and get his client off an arson charge. Anyone willing to burn their frank and beans to keep me out of jail is a guy I want working on my side.

He's a Public Defender in Wilmington NC, a very low cost of living place and also low pay. I also wager due to his age and job he is a recent grad so he has student loans.

A law degree is not a money making machine it was 20+ years ago. The field is saturated now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JimKiler

MagnusTheBrewer

IN MEMORIAM
Jun 19, 2004
24,122
1,594
126
I've had a lot of phones that have video capability.
None of them expose film or use magnetic tape in the process.
I'm old I know, but I must have missed something here. ;)
Ever take a non escalator escalator? Ever wipe your nose with a non kleenex kleenex? Ever dial a phone number on a cell phone?
 

Rubycon

Madame President
Aug 10, 2005
17,768
485
126
Your sarcasm meter must be using vacuum tubes with cold filaments. :p
 

Rubycon

Madame President
Aug 10, 2005
17,768
485
126
I used to irradiate mine with the radium source from a 1950s Gilbert spinthariscope.
In a bind you can take the active lining from a Revigator, roast in a retort at 900C and collect the radon gas for irradiation later.
Some collect thorium from old lantern mantles as well.
Whatever you do, don't fall for the cracked traser trick. The beta emissions from H3 are too weak and the gas dissipates far too rapidly to be of use!
 

Darwin333

Lifer
Dec 11, 2006
19,946
2,329
126
He's a Public Defender in Wilmington NC, a very low cost of living place and also low pay. I also wager due to his age and job he is a recent grad so he has student loans.

A law degree is not a money making machine it was 20+ years ago. The field is saturated now.

Well the very low cost of living would just add to my not wanting to hire him. Sorry but good lawyers make enough money to not have to drive for Uber.

My definition for lawyers is still:
A good lawyer knows the law.
A great lawyer knows the judge.
 

shortylickens

No Lifer
Jul 15, 2003
80,287
17,081
136
I looked it up and theres only a handful of places in the whole country that have legally banned the recording of police. And I think those places have lawyers trying to bring the matter up to higher courts.
 

Humpy

Diamond Member
Mar 3, 2011
4,464
596
126
I think the main takeaway isn't that cops are out to get you, but that if they fuck up they can likely persuade people to believe any version of events they want. A video recording makes that a little more difficult.

The bad cops will still just take the phone anyway.

I wonder how long it will be until cars come standard with built in, always on and uploaded video recording capability rather than relying on phones and cheap dashcams.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ch33zw1z

ch33zw1z

Lifer
Nov 4, 2004
39,737
20,305
146
Bright said he didn’t initially want to share his story to the media, but when Becker refused to return his phone calls and the department never apologized, he decided to go public.

Yeah, eff them. Idiots. And...

“I think the video shows that the police are willing to lie in order to coerce people into doing what they want them to do,” he said. “You just have to know your rights.”


I don't care if you're 16 or 60....LAWYER.

That said, I do not think most police are out to get "you." Their job sucks balls and they're underpaid.
I disagree with the underpaid thing.

Also, like any service field, it's a numbers game for them. So yea, sometimes they're looking for easy targets.
 
  • Like
Reactions: lxskllr

ch33zw1z

Lifer
Nov 4, 2004
39,737
20,305
146
I think the main takeaway isn't that cops are out to get you, but that if they fuck up they can likely persuade people to believe any version of events they want. A video recording makes that a little more difficult.

The bad cops will still just take the phone anyway.

I wonder how long it will be until cars come standard with built in, always on and uploaded video recording capability rather than relying on phones and cheap dashcams.
Police need body cams, always
 

GagHalfrunt

Lifer
Apr 19, 2001
25,284
1,998
126
I looked it up and theres only a handful of places in the whole country that have legally banned the recording of police. And I think those places have lawyers trying to bring the matter up to higher courts.

You looked it up wrong. It's legal to film everywhere. There used to be a few places that banned it, but that got overturned by one of the US Circuit Appeals courts (5th maybe?) which made it legal everywhere. As the Circuit Court is one step below the Supreme Court, only the Supremes have the power to change it. Until they do, filming police is legal everywhere in the USA.
 

Jeeebus

Diamond Member
Aug 29, 2006
9,181
901
126
You looked it up wrong. It's legal to film everywhere. There used to be a few places that banned it, but that got overturned by one of the US Circuit Appeals courts (either 8 or 9 IIRC) which made it legal everywhere. As the Circuit Court is one step below the Supreme Court, only the Supremes have the power to change it. Until they do, filming police is legal everywhere in the USA.

Umm... not exactly. Each federal circuit court of appeals oversees a few states and its rulings are only 'the law' within those states. The circuit courts differ on various issues, so the federal law in Florida may be interpreted than the federal law in California (unless of course the Supreme Court has settled the issue). That said, generally every court to consider the issue (state and federal) in the last several years has come down saying that filming in public is absolutely protected under First Amendment.
 

BarkingGhostar

Diamond Member
Nov 20, 2009
8,410
1,617
136
Bright said he didn’t initially want to share his story to the media, but when Becker refused to return his phone calls and the department never apologized, he decided to go public.

Yeah, eff them. Idiots. And...

“I think the video shows that the police are willing to lie in order to coerce people into doing what they want them to do,” he said. “You just have to know your rights.”


I don't care if you're 16 or 60....LAWYER.

That said, I do not think most police are out to get "you." Their job sucks balls and they're underpaid.
I don't give a rats fucking ass. No one forced them to take the job. And if they are going to take the job then do the job, not take it and do it poorly or illegally. Everyone should have a periscope like app on their phone for situations like this to show the world that simply confiscating the phone isn't going to destroy the evidence. If a cop is willing to lie while doing the job then they are probably willing to do a lot of other illegal things as well. A cop that lies on the job is not a cop, but a thug. A criminal.
 

Genx87

Lifer
Apr 8, 2002
41,091
513
126
Many states have passed laws that ban recording of public officials in their duty. They will actually charge you and try to get you to plea out. The last thing a prosecutor wants is to take this to trial where the law will be tossed out on constitutional grounds. Most people think because a law is passed it must be legal. So this type of intimidation actually works.