crisium
Platinum Member
- Aug 19, 2001
- 2,643
- 615
- 136
You know you've messed up when AMD invites Linus, of all people, but not you.
To be honest I don't really read anything on [H] anymore I just go there to look at benchmarks
Agreed. Their words do not match the data and they have preconceptions before they review that guide their conclusions. But as long as they don't fudge the numbers I like their testing methodology so it's worth including them as a resource along with other reviews, even if their game selection isn't always the most logical.
That explains it!! He thought Polaris 10 was a GP104 competitor due to faulty maths,and so soon to launch when it is obvious that a smaller chip won't do so,he is genuinely surprised. LOL.
It's a complete non-story. He thought 14nm was magical and Polaris 10 was meant to match 1080. Now even if it ends up at 1070 performance, 150W, $300, it's a disaster by his accounts. Whatever, game is still on.
That he thinks AMD's process has a 30% advantage based on no actual evidence is telling. It is quite clear that Polaris 10 was never intended to compete against the full GP104, and I don't see any room for misinterpretation of this.
Last edited: