PNAC and One World Government...

SSSnail

Lifer
Nov 29, 2006
17,458
83
86
Yes, another one of these threads, if you don't like it stay out of it and leave us tinfoil donning folks alone.

Anyways, all the pieces are coming together, and as days passed it's becoming very clear where all of this is heading, to consolidation.

Me thinks there will be some sort of global governance over finance and commodity from a single source (possibly a new organization) that will emerge from this mess. The guberment (reads Federal Reserves) already bought up some of the largest financial organizations, and possibly more to come.

Some interesting times ahead of us, hang on for the ride or party it up?
 

TehMac

Diamond Member
Aug 18, 2006
9,976
3
71
Just because the government owns these banks doesn't mean consolidation. What Bernanke is trying to do is buy banks abroad, get their act together, and then sell them off.

The 700 billion dollar bailout plan is really the government buying the shitty defaults and then selling them off later, in exchange for shares in AIG (for example; referencing a separate issue you posed) which they plan to sell off later.

This government consolidation thing is a load of bull shit. If you want to revel in ignorance, be my guest, but try to keep it offline.

Furthermore, any real tin foiling would really be appropriate in the 1930's when the government was creating new administrations, Corps, Authorities and so forth, right and left.

Why don't you go drone on about that rather than be obsessed with little fairies and red herrings that have only slight correlation in contemporary times?
 

PepePeru

Diamond Member
Jul 21, 2005
3,846
0
0
Wrong, it's the Rand Corporation working in concert with the Trilateral Commission.

 

SSSnail

Lifer
Nov 29, 2006
17,458
83
86
Orly? What is this "government" that you're speaking of? It's just the Federal Reserves with printed money that you and I will pay for. Who do you think will buy out these banks or shares, China? That 1930 boat has sailed and here we are again, giving more power and control to the FEDs. Call me ignorant all you want but the fact remains that the FEDs now control the largest banking and financial interests in the world.
 

smashp

Platinum Member
Aug 30, 2003
2,443
0
0
All the locals hide their tears of regret
Open fire cos I love you to death
Sky high, with a heartache of stone
Youll never see me cos Im always alone

How to love without a trace of dissent
Ill buy the torture cos you pay for the rent
Tied high with a broken command
Youre all alone to the promised land

Im in love with this malicious intent
Youve been taken but you dont know it yet
What you will know must never live to be found
Cos its the subject of the eyes of the clown
 

midway

Senior member
Oct 22, 2004
301
0
0
Originally posted by: G Wizard
Wrong, it's the Rand Corporation working in concert with the Trilateral Commission.

what about the reverse vampires?
 

PepePeru

Diamond Member
Jul 21, 2005
3,846
0
0
Originally posted by: midway
Originally posted by: G Wizard
Wrong, it's the Rand Corporation working in concert with the Trilateral Commission.

what about the reverse vampires?

now, were through the looking glass, people....
 

smashp

Platinum Member
Aug 30, 2003
2,443
0
0
Originally posted by: G Wizard
Originally posted by: midway
Originally posted by: G Wizard
Wrong, it's the Rand Corporation working in concert with the Trilateral Commission.

what about the reverse vampires?

now, were through the looking glass, people....

Wasnt this all predicted by Nostradamus?
 

destrekor

Lifer
Nov 18, 2005
28,799
359
126
We won't be moving to world governance ANY time soon. Nor will the financial sector be moving to a unified world system.
It'll occur in small sections, and over time those will converge.

Within the next 20 years, I expect the European Union will become very close to being 'one'.
However, I honestly do not expect that to happen anywhere else for a long time, not unless a major world war erupts and large countries take over other relatively large and developed countries, or form very close treaties in response, and begin EU style systems elsewhere. It's foreseeable that the US and Canada will eventually move toward a EU style system economically.

Asia will likely never do so willingly, as the varied religions, and ethnic hatred due to religions, will likely prevent any cooperation as long as they remain in that state of mind.
Russia... well who knows with them.
Australia will go whichever way the wind blows, although most likely identifying with the EU if countries ever eventually start working together in that sense.
Africa as a whole would likely converge with enough time to sort out ethnic and tribal conflicts, and South America would be similar.

But before any of that could even become even a potential thought in the backs of minds, it'll take sometime truly nasty all over the world where many countries align with similarly minded ones, even with tension from within.
What the world is seeing at this moment is a far cry from something necessary to start that kind of process. But much like the EU, it'll be the UN that begins that kind of process through political talks.


aww... this moved to P&N? I'm out.
 

JS80

Lifer
Oct 24, 2005
26,271
7
81
This is a short term liquidity and arbitrage issue. It's not a movement to nationalize businesses.
 

OokiiNeko

Senior member
Jun 14, 2003
508
0
0
This government consolidation thing is a load of bull shit. If you want to revel in ignorance, be my guest, but try to keep it offline.

If you don`t like the thread, stay the fvck out of it.