Maetryx here,
I don't have a GF4. I don't have a BestBuy in my city. I never heard of the BB/GF4 fiasco until long after the original drama had unfolded. I don't want a GF4 at this time. This is my preamble and my disclaimer.
I think from reading all the BB/GF4 threads and other sources of information that BB has perpetuated an illegal bait and switch on the public. The original "price error" specifically mentioned that the customer was getting the deal for $200 less than the normal selling price. Whoever wrote that advertisement was fully aware of the magnitude of the discout. BB *accepted* orders for this product at that price, and charged customer's credit cards for the purchase.
By all elements of contract law, this was a done deal. BB was obligated by some of the most basic laws of this nation to honor their lawful contract with those customers. This was not a case where there was a lack of a "meeting of the minds". BB understood that they had sold a specific product for a specific price, and they further understood that they were selling that product for $200 less than their projected normal price. They accepted payment for the product.
No judge on earth should let BB out of the legally binding contract with the customers who's credit cards were charged that day. I don't have it in for BB. Again, the few times I've ever been in a BB, I really loved the place (which is what happens when you live in a remote place like I do). I happily spent money therein and wished my hometown had such a store. It doesn't change the fact that BB is obligated to fulfill their contracts, just like every other party to a legal contract in this country.