First - the fact that you're now trying to sneak in the term "major" in front of Bush's policies to retroactively qualify your claim has not escaped my attention.
There's no 'sneak in' - that's offensive language, and if you talk like an ass there will not be a discussion.
That was careful clarification in the case that there's a lack of common sense what the topic is. Why don't you quote the previous text that you allege it's changing?
That's one step from ending any discussion.
Secondly - C'mon, we all know how the Senate works. 51/49 or 49/51 doesn't make a whole of differences in terms of passing legislation in the Senate because of the threat of filibuster. In the past bills just wouldn't brought up if ther was no hope getting 60 votes.
Fern
You're confusing the Democrats use of the filibuster which was far more rare with the Republicans who have set records using it more than any time in history.
You will find plenty of bills Democrats opposed that passed by bare majorities, including Dick Cheney tie breakers, that were not filibusters like the Republicans.