Please recommend a RAID 5 solution for me

tpg0007

Junior Member
Mar 5, 2008
14
0
0
I know that RAID != backup, but for home use it just seems too expensive to have that much backup capacity for data that changes weekly, which leaves me only RAID 5 to consider in terms of expense and capacity and redundancy. I need at least 2T of accessible storage, preferably 2.5 or 3T. I don't want to dedicate another box as NAS RAID server if I can help it.

After a little research, and having never done any kind of RAID setup before (at least for home use), my options appear to be:

  • Pure hardware RAID
- there're very nice but very expensive RAID subsystems.

  • Hybrid RAID
- real RAID cards cost too much, so next best thing would be a card that takes some load off, perhaps in conjunction with a cheap external enclosure that has eSATA port multiplier. Concerned about migration and failure recovery though.

My mobo is an Abit IP35 Pro. It has onboard RAID 5 support (not sure how much of it hardware) through Intel ICH9R, but docu says it supports max of 4 drives and 2.1T. Case space is rather limited and a change in power supply would be required for the extra SATA connections. eSATA is handled through a JMicron controller that does not support RAID 5 but will hopefully at least accept multiplied external drives.

Please share your thoughts on what I should do. I'm leaning toward getting an enclosure, but in that case should I also get a cheap eSATA RAID card? They all have limitations on how many drives are supported and/or compatibility with particular port multipliers though, whereas the OS may not, as long as the drives are recognized. For example, RocketRAID 2302 says it supports up to 4 drives, but does that refer to its ability to hook up at most 4 drives or does the limit apply to total number of drives coming through the port multiplier too?
 

thecoolnessrune

Diamond Member
Jun 8, 2005
9,673
583
126
Well what you're looking for is a DAS (direct attached storage). These can be very expensive and can reach their limits of upgradability in a hurry. A NAS really would be better. Especially for 2TB of storage unless you really are looking for only one computer accessing it. The software and applications necessary to run one almost completely limit it to a proprietary box, usually in rackmount form.
 

tpg0007

Junior Member
Mar 5, 2008
14
0
0
Originally posted by: thecoolnessrune
Well what you're looking for is a DAS (direct attached storage). These can be very expensive and can reach their limits of upgradability in a hurry. A NAS really would be better. Especially for 2TB of storage unless you really are looking for only one computer accessing it. The software and applications necessary to run one almost completely limit it to a proprietary box, usually in rackmount form.

Thanks for the tip. Per your recommendation I decided to get a Synology CS407 NAS box. Of course, now I'm gonna need a new gig-e router to make use of the speed...
 

thecoolnessrune

Diamond Member
Jun 8, 2005
9,673
583
126
Make a post in Networking, though I feel a separate router and Gigabit switch would provide you with better options, upgrade ability, and speed. Still, ask Networking, several bright minds such as JackMDS can offer you far more expertise than myself.