Lemon law
Lifer
One day in the far distant future my phone monopoly provider, AT&T, will offer DSL
in my area---for now I limp along on dial up.
My dial up netwprk archtecture is extremely cheap but effective---two XP computers, each with an on mother board NIC connected with a cat 5e crossover cable. The host computer has a 56 K modem and the client computer gets internet access with microsoft internet connection sharing.---computer security is provided by software firewalls on both computers and a variety of anti-malware applications.
While I understand the basic principles of DSL---I am not sure what I will need to get a effectice internet sharing Lan when dsl becomes available---and I have a extremely vague understanding of an always on connection---the reason I mention this is because the under ground copper wires in my neigborhood are extremely vulnerable to lightning--so for now--using dial up, I always disconnect my phone line from my modem after I disconnect from the internet----after losing one modem and three modem surge suppressors to lighting in a two month period even when the computers were turned off.
And my house electrical wiring is moden and properly grounded.
But given I get the 1.5 mbps second AT&T option---I assume I will need to purchase a second NIC for the host computer---and some sort of external dsl modem that connects to the second NIC on the host computer. I would consider a router---but since I only need a 2 PC network---and the other question is would this require replacing the crossover cable with a patchcable---both expenses I prefer to avoid if possible.----but how do these options effect always on dsl and the fact I plan to continue disconnecting the phone line from the dsl modem after I shut done the computers.
My other question concerns having an ISP---with dial up I pay a given charge--is having a ISP required with dsl?---or is that an expense I can avoid if I get my email with something like hotmail or yahoo?
Can someone explain what I need to know---up sides and downsides of various options,
in plain english----and please don't say anything about cable modem---cable will never be available in my rural area---or saying anything about wireless options. Just keep it as simple as possible given my available options. ----and it looks like I am stuck with AT&T regardless if I like it or not.
in my area---for now I limp along on dial up.
My dial up netwprk archtecture is extremely cheap but effective---two XP computers, each with an on mother board NIC connected with a cat 5e crossover cable. The host computer has a 56 K modem and the client computer gets internet access with microsoft internet connection sharing.---computer security is provided by software firewalls on both computers and a variety of anti-malware applications.
While I understand the basic principles of DSL---I am not sure what I will need to get a effectice internet sharing Lan when dsl becomes available---and I have a extremely vague understanding of an always on connection---the reason I mention this is because the under ground copper wires in my neigborhood are extremely vulnerable to lightning--so for now--using dial up, I always disconnect my phone line from my modem after I disconnect from the internet----after losing one modem and three modem surge suppressors to lighting in a two month period even when the computers were turned off.
And my house electrical wiring is moden and properly grounded.
But given I get the 1.5 mbps second AT&T option---I assume I will need to purchase a second NIC for the host computer---and some sort of external dsl modem that connects to the second NIC on the host computer. I would consider a router---but since I only need a 2 PC network---and the other question is would this require replacing the crossover cable with a patchcable---both expenses I prefer to avoid if possible.----but how do these options effect always on dsl and the fact I plan to continue disconnecting the phone line from the dsl modem after I shut done the computers.
My other question concerns having an ISP---with dial up I pay a given charge--is having a ISP required with dsl?---or is that an expense I can avoid if I get my email with something like hotmail or yahoo?
Can someone explain what I need to know---up sides and downsides of various options,
in plain english----and please don't say anything about cable modem---cable will never be available in my rural area---or saying anything about wireless options. Just keep it as simple as possible given my available options. ----and it looks like I am stuck with AT&T regardless if I like it or not.