MaverickBP
Golden Member
- Nov 18, 2004
- 1,414
- 0
- 0
Originally posted by: Bigsm00th
Originally posted by: MaverickBP
Originally posted by: Bigsm00th
Originally posted by: MaverickBP
panasonic has a 42' model for around $3k. its only EDTV but i swear it looks better than any hdtv plasma.
p.s. enjoy ur burn in :thumbsup:
edit: toned it down some...
burn-in isnt an issue unless you are stupid.
lol burn in is an issue and yes it can be lessened with come common sense. but im sorry. im not spending $3k on a bright lively panel(which is what makes plasmas a plasma besides being thin) and drop it down to below 50% contrast. defeats the purpose. so please dont act like its not an issue and can be fixed easily. because the steps to lessen burn in do just that..lessen it. but it still happens.
then u gotta fix the low life span and repairability issue.
why do you need to lower the contrast? ive never had this issue and ive never had to do that.
i think you suck at operating your TV...thats why you think plasmas suck - because you dont know how to use it. i honestly have never had one burn-in problem, ever. my manual says 50,000 hour lifespan which is more than enough.
if you watched TV for 8 hours a day, 365 days a year, a 50,000 hour plasma would last for just over 17 years. 12 hours a day...a little over 11.4 years. after 11 years you will have a new, better looking TV anyway, but who even watchs TV for 12 hours a day? even 8 hours a day is way more than MOST people. so you are looking at 20+ years out of the TV...id say thats not a short lifespan.
lowering the contrast helps prevent burn in..or did u not know the cause of burn in? how long have u had this tv? ever try owning a plasma in states like colorado(i think it is) where the elevation causes problems with ur plasma?
i dont hate plasmas. they are nice. but got too many issues and shortcomings for the price they charge.
