• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Plasma Monitor Vs Plasma Television?

No TV tuner vs TV tuner

If you have a cable box, there is no point in having a tuner.
If you buy a set that has a tuner, you want to look for the "QAM" capability where it list the specs (ATSC, NTSC, QAM are the 3 I think). QAM lets you pull *unencrypted* HD feeds from the cable line in your home. ATSC, IIRC, lets you pull down free HD signal over the air *if* you live close enough to the towers.
 
Originally posted by: erniec
Just curious what's the difference btw these two things

A TV would have an internal tuner (and speakers) so you could receive OTA (over the air) broadcasts w/o an external tuner (like a cable box). Panasonic makes a commercial line of plasmas w/o tuners that many people prefer due to their low profile look.
 
most people these days can get away with just the monitor.

if you have a cable box and a hometheater system (dream system) than you should be good.

also some models of monitors have better service menus that allow you to tweak the display vs there tv counter parts

-fish
 
I would suggest a monitor if you have a cable box, and HT system. A monitor will usually look better than a tv, because it doesn't have the extra speakers. It'll also be lighter and should be cheaper as well.
 
Originally posted by: erniec
Thanks everyone's quick reply
Is buying just the plasma monitor cheaper than buying the plasma tv?

It really depends on the brands, oftentimes it is. Personally, I find a tv tuner worthless since I have directv and have to use the box with it anyway.
 
Back
Top