- Nov 18, 2002
- 3
- 0
- 0
Originally posted by: aldamon
I have my 811s hooked up to a JBL NSP-1 package (Four N24s and an N-CENTER) and the kickass $99 DLS 10" Subwoofer from Parts Express.
The decoding features (DD 5.1 / EX and DTS / DTS-ES / ProLogic II) are not the only impressive thing about this receiver. It also has pre-outs for all channels, supports multiple subs, has mounting posts instead of those crappy clips, has a nice learning remote and has plenty of assignable inputs. The only "bad" thing about this receiver is its relatively high crossover of 100. Oh wellIt's definitely worth a test drive to see if you like the Pioneer sound.
Originally posted by: alm99
Originally posted by: aldamon
I have my 811s hooked up to a JBL NSP-1 package (Four N24s and an N-CENTER) and the kickass $99 DLS 10" Subwoofer from Parts Express.
The decoding features (DD 5.1 / EX and DTS / DTS-ES / ProLogic II) are not the only impressive thing about this receiver. It also has pre-outs for all channels, supports multiple subs, has mounting posts instead of those crappy clips, has a nice learning remote and has plenty of assignable inputs. The only "bad" thing about this receiver is its relatively high crossover of 100. Oh wellIt's definitely worth a test drive to see if you like the Pioneer sound.
Is that subwoofer really any good? How does it compare to the Sony SA-WM40?
Originally posted by: underdawg
I bought mine at circuitcity.com to get the MSN 20% Holiday Reward credit and a $30 gift card by mail from circuit city. Then I printed price from bestbuy.com and went back to circuit city to pricematch.
CC price - 110% PM - 20% MSN - gift card = total
399.99 - 110.00 - 60.00 - 30.00 = 199.99 + tax
MSN adjusted the credit to the price after pricematch, so only $60 MSN money.
From what I've read, the 10" DLS subwoofer is *better* than the Sony SA-WM40.Originally posted by: NuKe9
Originally posted by: alm99
Originally posted by: aldamon
I have my 811s hooked up to a JBL NSP-1 package (Four N24s and an N-CENTER) and the kickass $99 DLS 10" Subwoofer from Parts Express.
The decoding features (DD 5.1 / EX and DTS / DTS-ES / ProLogic II) are not the only impressive thing about this receiver. It also has pre-outs for all channels, supports multiple subs, has mounting posts instead of those crappy clips, has a nice learning remote and has plenty of assignable inputs. The only "bad" thing about this receiver is its relatively high crossover of 100. Oh wellIt's definitely worth a test drive to see if you like the Pioneer sound.
Is that subwoofer really any good? How does it compare to the Sony SA-WM40?
I'm curious about this as well, too good to be true?
I just checked out a review at CNet. A negative is that it doesn't have a phono input. I admit I don't use my TT often, and I do have a receiver with TT input. Still it's a feature I'd like in a receiver. Is there a place you can go to find out how good the FM tuner section is? My current receiver's FM sucks.Originally posted by: bigsmooth
This receiver has an amazing feature set for the price, it gets a lot of positive mentions at AVSForum. It has a few down sides to it (specifically, the relatively high THD [distortion]) but a lot of people like it, especially because it's so cheap.
What's a turntable? (j/kOriginally posted by: Muse
I just checked out a review at CNet. A negative is that it doesn't have a phono input. I admit I don't use my TT often, and I do have a receiver with TT input. Still it's a feature I'd like in a receiver. Is there a place you can go to find out how good the FM tuner section is? My current receiver's FM sucks.Originally posted by: bigsmooth
This receiver has an amazing feature set for the price, it gets a lot of positive mentions at AVSForum. It has a few down sides to it (specifically, the relatively high THD [distortion]) but a lot of people like it, especially because it's so cheap.
I have a pretty nice ($400) TT but it's gotten VERY spare use. I have an amplified antenna (Terk, $80), and I somehow talked myself into believing it was doing the job and didn't return it to Circuit City, but I should have. It's a joke, even compared to a T antenna (properly used). In my experience, even some T antennas are more effective than others, very much so. I don't know why, but my car radios do a hell of a lot better than anything I have in the house. It's weird. Well, I don't have anything in the house that wouldn't be considered low end, so that's why, I figure. An electronics engineer I know who specializes in the audio side of things tells me that adequate FM chips have been pretty standard fare in receivers for decades now, but I'm skeptical about my cheapo stuff.Originally posted by: wje
What's a turntable? (j/kOriginally posted by: Muse
I just checked out a review at CNet. A negative is that it doesn't have a phono input. I admit I don't use my TT often, and I do have a receiver with TT input. Still it's a feature I'd like in a receiver. Is there a place you can go to find out how good the FM tuner section is? My current receiver's FM sucks.Originally posted by: bigsmooth
This receiver has an amazing feature set for the price, it gets a lot of positive mentions at AVSForum. It has a few down sides to it (specifically, the relatively high THD [distortion]) but a lot of people like it, especially because it's so cheap.) - I'm not aware of any sites that break down the FM sections and review them. In my experience, the tuning is only as good as source that's feeding it. Using the simple "T" antenna that gets supplied with a receiver is a joke. Purchasing something that's amplified and can pull in better signals is certainly what's needed. Given the fact that Pioneer developed the "SuperTuner" feature for improved tuner performance in their car stereo line, one would hope that some of this technology was shared with their home receiver market.