pink floyd

[jimmypage13]

I think Îam in love with pink floyd :heart: , but who do you think is a better composer:

Roger waters: money, another brick in the wall 1, 2 and 3, hey you etc

or

David gilmour: Sorrow, high hopes, keep talking, comfortably numb etc

 

[iamaelephant]

Roger Waters. He was responsible for much of The Wall, plus his solo stuff is amazing.

 

[TheGizmo]

roger waters... of course!


edit: and oh yea, pink floyd = gods of music

 

[NL5]

They are both pretty amazing in their own rights, but Gilmour is a big reason why Waters stuff sounded so good. Have you heard Rogers version of "Money"????

 

[Babbles]

While Roger Waters was indeed a powerful creative force, he was a very, very poor musician. His solo stuff is pretty bad, and there are accounts of Gilmour having to play Roger Waters' stuff during studio recordings.

This is sort of comparing apples and oranges: Gilmour is by far the better musician, but Waters had a more unique sense of creativity.

 

[bctbct]

both are good, together they are awesome

 

[iamaelephant]

Originally posted by: Babbles
While Roger Waters was indeed a powerful creative force, he was a very, very poor musician. His solo stuff is pretty bad, and there are accounts of Gilmour having to play Roger Waters' stuff during studio recordings.

This is sort of comparing apples and oranges: Gilmour is by far the better musician, but Waters had a more unique sense of creativity.

His solo stuff is great.

 

[Babbles]

Originally posted by: iamaelephant

Originally posted by: Babbles
While Roger Waters was indeed a powerful creative force, he was a very, very poor musician. His solo stuff is pretty bad, and there are accounts of Gilmour having to play Roger Waters' stuff during studio recordings.

This is sort of comparing apples and oranges: Gilmour is by far the better musician, but Waters had a more unique sense of creativity.

His solo stuff is great.

No, not really. Unless you are talking about Gilmour.

 

[pulse8]

Originally posted by: Babbles
While Roger Waters was indeed a powerful creative force, he was a very, very poor musician. His solo stuff is pretty bad, and there are accounts of Gilmour having to play Roger Waters' stuff during studio recordings.

This is sort of comparing apples and oranges: Gilmour is by far the better musician, but Waters had a more unique sense of creativity.

Couldn't have said it better myself. If Pink Floyd was to tour tomorrow without new material, I would much rather see it with Nick, Richard and David than to just have Roger.

 

[Captante]

Roger Waters gives better concerts then David Gilmore & neither of them has made very good solo albums ... by far the best of all was the two of them played together.

 

[DainBramaged]

I love hearing Gilmour play. My God. On The Turning Away is amazing.

 

[Platypus]

Gilmour without a fvcking doubt, Waters sucks as a musician and as a person.

Gilmour is responsible for the soul of PF.

 

[JulesMaximus]

Yeah, I remember getting all fvcked up and going to the midnight showing of "The Wall" every Saturday night for the better part of a summer back in the 80s...good times.

 

[sixone]

Originally posted by: Platypus
Gilmour without a fvcking doubt, Waters sucks as a musician and as a person.

Gilmour is responsible for the soul of PF.

QFT