• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

pink floyd

J

jimmypage13

Senior member
I think Îam in love with pink floyd :heart: 😀, but who do you think is a better composer:

Roger waters: money, another brick in the wall 1, 2 and 3, hey you etc

or

David gilmour: Sorrow, high hopes, keep talking, comfortably numb etc
 
They are both pretty amazing in their own rights, but Gilmour is a big reason why Waters stuff sounded so good. Have you heard Rogers version of "Money"????

 
While Roger Waters was indeed a powerful creative force, he was a very, very poor musician. His solo stuff is pretty bad, and there are accounts of Gilmour having to play Roger Waters' stuff during studio recordings.

This is sort of comparing apples and oranges: Gilmour is by far the better musician, but Waters had a more unique sense of creativity.
 
Originally posted by: Babbles
While Roger Waters was indeed a powerful creative force, he was a very, very poor musician. His solo stuff is pretty bad, and there are accounts of Gilmour having to play Roger Waters' stuff during studio recordings.

This is sort of comparing apples and oranges: Gilmour is by far the better musician, but Waters had a more unique sense of creativity.
Click to expand...

His solo stuff is great.
 
Originally posted by: iamaelephant
Originally posted by: Babbles
While Roger Waters was indeed a powerful creative force, he was a very, very poor musician. His solo stuff is pretty bad, and there are accounts of Gilmour having to play Roger Waters' stuff during studio recordings.

This is sort of comparing apples and oranges: Gilmour is by far the better musician, but Waters had a more unique sense of creativity.
Click to expand...

His solo stuff is great.
Click to expand...

No, not really. Unless you are talking about Gilmour.
 
Originally posted by: Babbles
While Roger Waters was indeed a powerful creative force, he was a very, very poor musician. His solo stuff is pretty bad, and there are accounts of Gilmour having to play Roger Waters' stuff during studio recordings.

This is sort of comparing apples and oranges: Gilmour is by far the better musician, but Waters had a more unique sense of creativity.
Click to expand...

Couldn't have said it better myself. If Pink Floyd was to tour tomorrow without new material, I would much rather see it with Nick, Richard and David than to just have Roger.
 
Roger Waters gives better concerts then David Gilmore & neither of them has made very good solo albums ... by far the best of all was the two of them played together.
 
Gilmour without a fvcking doubt, Waters sucks as a musician and as a person.

Gilmour is responsible for the soul of PF.
 
Yeah, I remember getting all fvcked up and going to the midnight showing of "The Wall" every Saturday night for the better part of a summer back in the 80s...good times. 😛
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top