Originally posted by: Anubis
its not really much diff then whatever the current version is
Originally posted by: Shawn
Looks the same except a lot more bland. Don't see what the big deal is.
Originally posted by: PurdueRy
Originally posted by: Shawn
Looks the same except a lot more bland. Don't see what the big deal is.
ITS FASTER
Originally posted by: fs5
Originally posted by: PurdueRy
Originally posted by: Shawn
Looks the same except a lot more bland. Don't see what the big deal is.
ITS FASTER
yeah but it's missing all the stuff that was in the previous version like user albums. That version (3?) was the best in terms of features. Just needed a usability overhaul.
umm according to who???? according to FF, pics v2 is actually faster taking 0.953s to load the last 25 pics where as the beta takes 1.203s. either way it's less than half a second difference. :roll:Originally posted by: PurdueRy
Originally posted by: Shawn
Looks the same except a lot more bland. Don't see what the big deal is.
ITS FASTER
Originally posted by: dugweb
It always makes me laugh browsing the recently uploaded pics on pics.bbzzdd.com. It's funny to see some of the pictures that some person thought important enough to upload to share with all of us on ATOT 😛
like this one for example... wtf lol!
Originally posted by: Shawn
umm according to who???? according to FF, pics v2 is actually faster taking 0.953s to load the last 25 pics where as the beta takes 1.203s. either way it's less than half a second difference. :roll:Originally posted by: PurdueRy
Originally posted by: Shawn
Looks the same except a lot more bland. Don't see what the big deal is.
ITS FASTER
Originally posted by: PurdueRy
Originally posted by: Shawn
umm according to who???? according to FF, pics v2 is actually faster taking 0.953s to load the last 25 pics where as the beta takes 1.203s. either way it's less than half a second difference. :roll:Originally posted by: PurdueRy
Originally posted by: Shawn
Looks the same except a lot more bland. Don't see what the big deal is.
ITS FASTER
um, I thought that it was implied that we were comparing it to version 3.0 which we have been using for quite sometime now... :roll: