• We’re currently investigating an issue related to the forum theme and styling that is impacting page layout and visual formatting. The problem has been identified, and we are actively working on a resolution. There is no impact to user data or functionality, this is strictly a front-end display issue. We’ll post an update once the fix has been deployed. Thanks for your patience while we get this sorted.

Picky nerds on the internet SNWS

Status
Not open for further replies.
1st one has a weirdly proportioned ass in comparison to rest of her body. :/ It could be the pose, but it's just off.

Rest are not really that great (especially one with the tongue sticking out, ugh, not attractive at all actually). Alizee is amazing, but she's like 30+ now and had kids or something of that sort... 😛
 
TridenT said:
1st one has a weirdly proportioned ass in comparison to rest of her body. :/ It could be the pose, but it's just off.

Rest are not really that great (especially one with the tongue sticking out, ugh, not attractive at all actually). Alizee is amazing, but she's like 30+ now and had kids or something of that sort... 😛
Click to expand...

For the first one, it's Stacy Keibler, and her ass is absolutely amazing. It is perfectly proportioned in every way.

As for the rest, get real dude. Hell, Alizee...
http://www.3rdw.net/alizee/photos/2011-01-30-Montpellier-Les-Enfoires/20110131--_DSC3341.jpg
There's Alizee, from 10 months ago. You going to insist you wouldn't hit that? Or any of the pictures? That none of them are attractive?

Fuck it. You're going to die a lonely friendless virgin.
 
MotF Bane said:
For the first one, it's Stacy Keibler, and her ass is absolutely amazing. It is perfectly proportioned in every way.

As for the rest, get real dude. Hell, Alizee...
http://www.3rdw.net/alizee/photos/2011-01-30-Montpellier-Les-Enfoires/20110131--_DSC3341.jpg
There's Alizee, from 10 months ago. You going to insist you wouldn't hit that? Or any of the pictures? That none of them are attractive?

Fuck it. You're going to die a lonely friendless virgin.
Click to expand...

Thanks for the name drop.

Number 4 is Sophie Howard.
 
for OP and those that haven't read the babe thread rules, i quote from the babe thread in L&R
Nudity of any kind is banned when it comes to embedded pics. No breasts, genitals.

Pics of people in revealing skimpy bathing suits, underwear, etc aren't supposed to be embedded either. When it comes to embedded pics, too much skin is deemed excessively NSFW and as such is verboten.

Linking is a different matter.

You are allowed to link to pics containing nudity provided the link is clearly marked as "NSFW", preferably it would clarify even further as in "NSFW - contains nudity" since some people differentiate between NSFW text and NSFW images.

However, you are not allowed to post links leading to images or sites containing images that are "sexually charged". What this means is a photo of an individual engaging in some form of masturbation or excessively provocative poses (spread-eagle, etc), or more than one individual engaging each other in some form or another that is intended to be construed as a sex act.

Those types of linked images are verboten, even if labeled as NSFW. I.e. no links to porn.

There were a number of links in here that led to sites which contained some images of nudity, the one's I saw met the requirements of what is allowed here in the babe thread as a matter of linked images.

Where we need to do a better job is in our embedded images, the embedded images are getting a tad raunchy and that is going to only make trouble for yourselves. Keep the raunchy as a link with NSFW tags, not embedded.

Administrator Idontcare
Click to expand...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

TRENDING THREADS

Back
Top