Originally posted by: shuttleteam
This is funny. The fine is ridiculous I agree. I know how these systems work. Trust me, everyone that gets a ticket from a photo enforced traffic signal deserves it plain and simple. If you don't run red lights, you will not get a ticket! In MD the fine is $75.00. I suppose with what the cost of living is in CA, $250+ is probably right! :Q
-DAK-
Originally posted by: Bushwicktrini
Originally posted by: shuttleteam
This is funny. The fine is ridiculous I agree. I know how these systems work. Trust me, everyone that gets a ticket from a photo enforced traffic signal deserves it plain and simple. If you don't run red lights, you will not get a ticket! In MD the fine is $75.00. I suppose with what the cost of living is in CA, $250+ is probably right! :Q
-DAK-
The fine is only $50 here in NYC so I don't think cost of living has anything to do with it. I know the cost as I have been caught 4 timesall on what I thought were bougus ie the pic said that the light had been red for .33 of a sec how can I stop in .33 sec?. I now stop at the yellow not matter what
Originally posted by: vegetation
Bad idea because rarely cops are the one who assess the potential violations in photo traps. There is absolutely no judgment used to determine if a citation is warranted. For example, an ambulance may be coming up on a crowded intersection, prompting the right lane driver to make a turn on right; if there's no turn on right allowed, he/she is cited by the system instantly. To prove your innocence, you need to go to court, get the ambulance driver to testify, and possibly other witnesses. No cop in their right mind would ever ticket someone for doing this, in fact you would be ticketed for NOT moving aside for an emergency vehicle.
stupid idea. Even worse when you look at the corruption that has followed the installation of these things.
Originally posted by: guapo337
Originally posted by: Bushwicktrini
Originally posted by: shuttleteam
This is funny. The fine is ridiculous I agree. I know how these systems work. Trust me, everyone that gets a ticket from a photo enforced traffic signal deserves it plain and simple. If you don't run red lights, you will not get a ticket! In MD the fine is $75.00. I suppose with what the cost of living is in CA, $250+ is probably right! :Q
-DAK-
The fine is only $50 here in NYC so I don't think cost of living has anything to do with it. I know the cost as I have been caught 4 timesall on what I thought were bougus ie the pic said that the light had been red for .33 of a sec how can I stop in .33 sec?. I now stop at the yellow not matter what
good idea on finally deciding to stop at red lights.. it's not a law for a stupid reason now, is it?
![]()
http://www.usatoday.com/tech/news/2001-09-05-judge-nixes-red-light-cams.htmOriginally posted by: shuttleteam
This is funny. The fine is ridiculous I agree. I know how these systems work. Trust me, everyone that gets a ticket from a photo enforced traffic signal deserves it plain and simple. If you don't run red lights, you will not get a ticket! In MD the fine is $75.00. I suppose with what the cost of living is in CA, $250+ is probably right! :Q
-DAK-
Originally posted by: shuttleteam
I guess LM is getting greedy now that the X33 has been sidelined. :Q
-DAK-
Originally posted by: YingYang
Just wanted t see how many people in this forum believe that photoenforced traffic lights should be banned. In California the fine is $271 if you get caught running a red light.
They should be unconstitutional because of due process.
The camera gets the license plate, not a positive ID of the driver. The ticket goes to the driver, not the car. There's no due process. You need a cop at the light manually pulling people over.
Originally posted by: mithrandir2001
They should be unconstitutional because of due process.
The camera gets the license plate, not a positive ID of the driver. The ticket goes to the driver, not the car. There's no due process. You need a cop at the light manually pulling people over.
Originally posted by: conjur
What are you driving? A Mr. Bean-mobile?? My old Yamaha 750 was usually heavy enough to trip the sensor at most intersections.
Guess I can jump out and hit the crossing light button to get the light to change when I can't trip the sensors.
I've never heard of a sensor based on weight. Most use an inductive sensor in the road that detects the presence of metal.
Or use the remote trunk release, assuming the plate is attached to the trunk lid.Originally posted by: shuttleteam
Guess I can jump out and hit the crossing light button to get the light to change when I can't trip the sensors.
Mount a cat flap upside down [above the license plate] with a button on the dashboard. When depressed, the flap falls in front of the license plate and the picture is useless.![]()