phenom fx-6200 official spec's, somethings different..

[IonusX]

one of these cpu's has changes!
earlier specws for the 6200 appear to be 3rd party and inaccurate for the 6200. here is the official amd website ones:
http://www.donanimhaber.com/islemci/haberleri/AMDnin-6-cekirdekli-FX6200-islemcisi-resmiyet-kazandi.htm
note the increased TDP from 95 -125
also note the clock speed jump of .5ghz (turbo and ref.) and that the serial numbers for the 6200 are modified from the 6100's not unique unto themselves.
we will need to see more to see if this is enough to discuss, lets face it disappointment is a ---- the 2nd time around

 

[Vesku]

If that's correct info then it seems they've been saving the best of the 3 good module dies for this SKU. Explains why people OCing FX-6100s haven't gotten better average MHz than the FX-8000 OCs.

 

[IonusX]

If that's correct info then it seems they've been saving the best of the 3 good module dies for this SKU. Explains why people OCing FX-6100s haven't gotten better average MHz than the FX-8000 OCs.

mmhmm id like to see where this is going.. it good be very wise move on their p[art to rol out n salvage whats left of BD

 

[Soleron]

They just killed their naming system.

Opteron Magny-Cours was 41xx, 61xx series
Interlagos was 42xx, 62xx series, so increment the second digit for generation, first for segmentation

So I expected FX-41xx, 61xx, 81xx
Then Piledriver to be 42xx, 62xx, 82xx

 

[TurtleCrusher]

They just killed their naming system.

Opteron Magny-Cours was 41xx, 61xx series
Interlagos was 42xx, 62xx series, so increment the second digit for generation, first for segmentation

So I expected FX-41xx, 61xx, 81xx
Then Piledriver to be 42xx, 62xx, 82xx

Ugh. They killed your interpretation of their naming system.

Wahh?