Yes, you are right. So let's call this an estimate:
According to several reviews (AT
for example) the CB23 ST performance is practically identical to th 1165G. So let's take its 553 seconds and with the 3,8w from you and Andrei we have 2101Ws for the run. So we are looking at a PES of 860,7. That is total carnage for basically anyone else. I need to insert that into the x-y-chart because I think visually this is better to grasp. That is like NFL vs. High-school Football.
What is interesting is that M1 loses a lot of its relative advantage in MT.
If we take the 7833 points from Andrei we are looking at around 102s for one run (because approximately CB23 score = 800000 / duration in seconds).
So with 15w we get around 1530ws and a PES of “only" around 6400.
That is still only second to the 16c/32t 5950x but nevertheless a significant relative regression.
Here I an only speculate:
- Icestorm is not so much an efficiency core for PPW but PPA.
- At full load Icestorm is way beyond its perf-eff-sweet-spot as it was designed for light load (background tasks, low frequency and voltage).
- Something entirely different.