Just curious, in practical terms what would be the performance gains, assuming everything else is equal, from changing my motherboard from an A7V (KT133) with an ATA100 drive to either
- KT266A with ATA133 (I'm leaning Soltek @ $115 on Newegg)
or
- SIS with ATA100 (Leadtek or ECS)
The price difference between the two is substantial. In addition, I don't have to purchase new memory in order to upgrade to a Sis, allowing to save $ and spread the cost of upgrading to DDR and XP out in phases as I can afford it. However, I have a nagging suspicion that the Soltek is going to be easier on my blood pressure.
Any opinions or guesses as to the performance gain contributed from the MB/HD/RAM only? Thanks.
- KT266A with ATA133 (I'm leaning Soltek @ $115 on Newegg)
or
- SIS with ATA100 (Leadtek or ECS)
The price difference between the two is substantial. In addition, I don't have to purchase new memory in order to upgrade to a Sis, allowing to save $ and spread the cost of upgrading to DDR and XP out in phases as I can afford it. However, I have a nagging suspicion that the Soltek is going to be easier on my blood pressure.
Any opinions or guesses as to the performance gain contributed from the MB/HD/RAM only? Thanks.
